2018
DOI: 10.1590/rbz4720180073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between urinary tract infection and reproductive performance of sows

Abstract: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and influence of urinary tract infection on the reproductive performance of sows. The animals underwent urine tests using reagent strips and diagnosed as positive or negative. They were then divided into two groups of 30 positive and 30 negative sows for urinary tract infection. Each sow was considered an experimental unit and was followed from labor to weaning. The animals were assessed for their reproductive performance (labor duration, number of live births, mummifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The urine samples were collected by spontaneous urination and, following the recommendation of Polo et al (2013), the first urine of the morning was used, before feeding, which happened approximately at 7 A.M. All the sows had their vulvae cleaned and, in all collections, the first spurts of urine were discarded (MAZZUTI et al, 2013b;MOURA et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The urine samples were collected by spontaneous urination and, following the recommendation of Polo et al (2013), the first urine of the morning was used, before feeding, which happened approximately at 7 A.M. All the sows had their vulvae cleaned and, in all collections, the first spurts of urine were discarded (MAZZUTI et al, 2013b;MOURA et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Merlini;Merlini (2011), the impact of pig farming on the world economy requires production to be directed to industrial scale, requiring the control of diseases that affect economic output, including urinary infection (UI). It is highly prevalent in the current production systems, causing economic losses due to predisposition to reproductive failure, leading to an increase in the elimination of reproductive females and in the replacement rates (MAZUTTI et al, 2013a;RITTERBUSCH et al, 2014;MOURA et al, 2018). Because of this, many authors have studied the influence of periparturient diseases in the reproductive performance of sows (PORTO et al, 2004;RUEDA LÓPEZ, 2008;BORDIN;GOMES;BUENO, 2012;BELLINO et al, 2013;VENANCIO et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of UTI which was estimated in live sows [13][14][15][16] as well as at abattoirs [3,12,17], by either reagent strip tests, urine culture or histopathology, vary considerably from 15.8 [15] to 58% [16]. There are many reasonable explanations for this wide variation in estimates which challenge the comparability among study results; the most important being the different case definitions, and the different parity structure of the studied sow populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A European report indicated that UTI affects from 22% to 40% of sows (Martineau & Almond, 2008). This rate ranges from 29% to 41% of sows in Brazil (Moura et al, 2018;Alberton et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%