2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between NRT measurement level and behavioral levels in pediatrics cochlear implant patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, fitting methods based on objectively measured parameters have been sought. Different researchers tried to use electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses, electrically-evoked stapedius reflex thresholds or measurements of the electrically-evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) [Mittal and Panwar, 2009;Muhaimeed et al, 2010;Pau et al, 2011;Van Den Abbeele et al, 2012]. Even though the correlations of these measures with the behavioural thresholds (T levels) and hearing comfort levels (C levels) are relatively weak [Holstad et al, 2009;Potts et al, 2007;Smoorenburg et al, 2002;Tao et al, 2011] for particular electrodes, fittings based on the objective profiles with subsequent behavioural adaptation of the 'shift and tilt' [Hughes et al, 2001;King et al, 2006;Smoorenburg et al, 2002] are widely used and currently rank among the best available options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, fitting methods based on objectively measured parameters have been sought. Different researchers tried to use electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses, electrically-evoked stapedius reflex thresholds or measurements of the electrically-evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) [Mittal and Panwar, 2009;Muhaimeed et al, 2010;Pau et al, 2011;Van Den Abbeele et al, 2012]. Even though the correlations of these measures with the behavioural thresholds (T levels) and hearing comfort levels (C levels) are relatively weak [Holstad et al, 2009;Potts et al, 2007;Smoorenburg et al, 2002;Tao et al, 2011] for particular electrodes, fittings based on the objective profiles with subsequent behavioural adaptation of the 'shift and tilt' [Hughes et al, 2001;King et al, 2006;Smoorenburg et al, 2002] are widely used and currently rank among the best available options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, electrophysiological measures such as EABR and ECAP do not necessarily correlate with behavioral threshold or comfort levels. Several studies have evaluated the relationship between eSRT, EABR, and ECAP and behavioral threshold and comfort levels (1113) and found that ECAP threshold data were highly variable and tended to underpredict behavioral comfort levels. EABR was found to better predict behavioral threshold levels than comfort levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other studies, in accordance with the design of the studies, included subjects of wide range of ageschildren and adults together [29,31,61]. Some studies included prelingually deaf children of various ages [32,33,36,39] and some included only young children [37,43,47,62]. There are also studies that compared results of children vs. adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have shown that ECAP thresholds fall inside dynamic ranges, what made that procedure useful in programming young children [35,36]. According to some authors these thresholds usually fall within the same proportion of a subject's dynamic range across electrodes [33,35,37]. There are also studies that showed that relationship between ECAP thresholds and map levels are not simple and uniform [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%