1999
DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199911)42:11<2372::aid-anr16>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlates of the disability index of the health assessment questionnaire: A measure of functional impairment in systemic sclerosis

Abstract: Objective. To evaluate functional impairment in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma at the time of entry into a trial of a therapeutic intervention (D-penicillamine).Methods. The 20-item Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) was administered to 134 patients as they entered a multicenter trial of high-dose versus low-dose D-penicillamine. All patients had diffuse SSc of <18 months' duration. SSc patients who had severe organ system involvement and rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
73
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(18 reference statements)
12
73
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…15,28,29 In our study, the median HAQ score was 0.50 (interquartile range 0.25-0.87). Most of the patients (79.1%) had mild to moderate disability, which was different compared to the study of Clements et al, 30 who reported a mean baseline score of 1.04±0.67, which correlates with moderate to severe disability. We demonstrated a significant correlation between HAQ and FEV 1 /FVC (%) (r=0.439, p=0.007), and also between HAQ and DLCO divided by alveolar volume (r= -0.347, p=0.045).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…15,28,29 In our study, the median HAQ score was 0.50 (interquartile range 0.25-0.87). Most of the patients (79.1%) had mild to moderate disability, which was different compared to the study of Clements et al, 30 who reported a mean baseline score of 1.04±0.67, which correlates with moderate to severe disability. We demonstrated a significant correlation between HAQ and FEV 1 /FVC (%) (r=0.439, p=0.007), and also between HAQ and DLCO divided by alveolar volume (r= -0.347, p=0.045).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The overall HAQ DI score is determined by summing the highest item score in each of the 8 domains and dividing the sum by 8, yielding a score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). In the original HAQ DI, an additional grade of difficulty was added for persons using assistive/adaptive devices (such as a cane or walker); however, as in more recent studies (21,22), we did not modify subjects' responses for use of assistive/adaptive devices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These evaluations included a medical history, physical examination, complete blood count, serum chemistries, autoantibodies (Scl-70, ANA), thyroid function tests, validated standard measurements of the mRSS, pulmonary function testing for FVC and DLCO adj , high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of the chest, multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan of the heart or echocardiogram for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and a modified Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (mHAQ-DI). 5,[17][18][19][20][21] An ophthalmologic examination was done at the last study evaluation to assess for cataracts. In a subset of consenting patients, skin biopsies were done after HDIT next to the site of the baseline biopsy.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%