2003
DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.10217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate philanthropy: When is giving effective?

Abstract: annual fundraiser or to meet a current crisis situation. In contrast, institutional philanthropy reflects a considered approach that often results in the establishment of a foundation or gifts to an existing foundation; in turn, the foundations provide grants for charitable purposes from the income of the original funding so that the original (and any additional) donations are kept intact. Both of these types of philanthropy, however, make the presumption that donations are always in dollars when, in fact, bus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Firms with larger boards of directors are associated with higher levels of charitable giving, greater tendencies to establish corporate foundations, and concomitantly higher levels of product-market diversification (Brown et al, 2006). External stakeholdersincluding regulators and capital providersthat have positive perceptions about a company's community philanthropy are more likely to: recommend the company and its products and services; believe in the excellence of the company's reputation; and remain loyal to the company relative to continued supplier relationships, employment or investment (Bloom et al, 2006;Raiborn et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussion Propositions and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms with larger boards of directors are associated with higher levels of charitable giving, greater tendencies to establish corporate foundations, and concomitantly higher levels of product-market diversification (Brown et al, 2006). External stakeholdersincluding regulators and capital providersthat have positive perceptions about a company's community philanthropy are more likely to: recommend the company and its products and services; believe in the excellence of the company's reputation; and remain loyal to the company relative to continued supplier relationships, employment or investment (Bloom et al, 2006;Raiborn et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussion Propositions and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a well-planned legitimisation action can bring multiple benefits. Raiborn et al (2003) suggest that philanthropic activities increasingly support the overall performance of the organisation by improving the internal environment. Additionally, corporate philanthropy influences external communication as well as employees' perceptions of the organisation (Gond et al, 2010;Zhao & Zhang, 2019).…”
Section: Who Are the Givers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This face of patronage tends to make citizens suspicious. The more they become convinced that there are hidden intentions behind apparent “generosity,” the less the public shows interest (Raiborn et al , 2003). Therefore, this behavior appears positive at first glance, but a negative impact on the company’s reputation and even on public administration can be observed.…”
Section: Ethical Foundations Of Patronage and Sponsorshipmentioning
confidence: 99%