2009
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corono‐apical leakage of various root filling materials using two different penetration models—A 3‐month study

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to analyze the sealing ability of various filling combinations in a 90 days period using fluid transport and glucose penetration models. Premolars (n = 108) were filled with either gutta-percha (groups 1-4) or Resilon (groups 5-8) core materials combined with AH Plus (groups 1, 3, 5, 7) or Epiphany (groups 2, 4, 6, 8) sealers by using cold lateral compaction (groups 1, 2, groups 5, 6) or System B with Obtura II (groups 3, 4, groups 7, 8). The sealing ability of each sample was eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sealing qualities of the test materials were recorded following the progress of a tiny air bubble travelling within a 25‐μL glass capillary tube (Microcaps; Fisher Scientific, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The methodology and set‐up for the fluid transport model have been described elsewhere (Kececi et al. 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sealing qualities of the test materials were recorded following the progress of a tiny air bubble travelling within a 25‐μL glass capillary tube (Microcaps; Fisher Scientific, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The methodology and set‐up for the fluid transport model have been described elsewhere (Kececi et al. 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sealing qualities of the test materials were recorded following the progress of a tiny air bubble travelling within a 25-lL glass capillary tube (Microcaps; Fisher Scientific, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The methodology and set-up for the fluid transport model have been described elsewhere (Kececi et al 2010). To estimate the fluid movement through the root fillings, 0.2 bar water pressure was applied to the roots for 24 h during the third day after the root filling procedure, and fluid flow was measured continuously.…”
Section: Fluid Transport Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its limitations and its labor- and time-consuming character, the glucose penetration test has been used by many researchers [ 22 , 23 , 26 , 27 ]. Its great advantage is also that leakage measurements can be made at any time intervals determined by the investigator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this method is the ability to perform continuous quantitative microleakage analysis as such methods are rare in root canal filling materials (Kim et al, 2015;Jang et al, 2010). Shemesh et al (2007) and Kececi et al (2010) reported that the glucose penetration model seemed to have a superior sensitivity to measure the sealing ability of root canal filling material than the fluid penetration model. The choice of tracer material should be carefully chosen because its size and physicochemical properties may influence the result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%