Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Simple Approach (from the Cordoba &amp; Las Palmas [CORPAL] Kiss Trial)

Pan, Manuel; Medina, Alfonso; Lezo, José Suárez de; Romero, Miguel; Segura, José; Martín, Pedro; Lezo, Javier Suárez de; Hernández, Enrique; Mazuelos, Francisco; Moreno, Álvaro; Pavlovic, Djordje; Ojeda, Soledad; Toledano, Francisco; León, Carmen

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.022

Cited by 40 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…3, 4 The LCx orifice in the present patient had been compromised by excessive neointimal formation over a period of 4 years. It has been reported that most non-apposed SB struts appear covered at follow-up but that neointimal healing is primarily impaired.…”

Section: Images In Cardiovascular Medicine Sequel Of Jailed Side Branchmentioning

confidence: 97%

Sequel of Jailed Side Branch

Tateishi

Okamura

Yamada

et al. 2014

Circ J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Images In Cardiovascular Medicine Sequel Of Jailed Side Branchmentioning

confidence: 97%

Sequel of Jailed Side Branch

Tateishi

Okamura

Yamada

et al. 2014

Circ J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, despite the amount of data favoring KB, clinical studies have supported the value of this technique only in patients undergoing percutaneous bifurcation intervention by a complex 2-stent strategy (75)(76)(77)(78)(79). In patients treated by a 1-stent technique, published trials to date do not allow the endorsement of systematic KB owing to the lack of significant advantage or penalty (59,70,71). Surely, KB is a complex procedure influenced by a number of parameters that can be modified by the operator.…”

Section: Final Remarksmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…In the CORPAL (Cordoba & Las Palmas) Kiss trial, IVUS findings were assessed in 101 patients treated by a 1-stent technique for coronary bifurcation disease (59). Patients randomized to KB showed a larger proximal stent cross-sectional area than did the patients from the non-KB group, suggesting overexpansion of the proximal MV stent.…”

Section: Imaging Assessment Of Kbmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, in the CORPAL Kiss Trial, patients with bifurcation lesions treated by a simple approach with sirolimus-or everolimus-eluting stents (50% each) were randomized to KB (n ϭ 124) and non-KB (n ϭ 120) with the MV stent cell opened toward the SB with single-balloon dilation in all patients of the non-KB group (59). The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was similar in both groups at 1-year follow-up (Table 1).…”

Section: Clinical Assessment Of Kbmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Kissing Balloon Inflation in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Sgueglia

Chevalier

2012

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bifurcation lesions are the most frequently approached complex coronary lesions in everyday interventional practice. Bifurcations complexity relies essentially on their very specific anatomy that is imperfectly handled by current coronary devices and, despite dedicated techniques and drug-eluting stents, percutaneous coronary interventions directed toward the treatment of bifurcations are technically demanding and require proper execution. Kissing balloon (KB) inflation was the first specific bifurcation technique to have been developed for percutaneous bifurcation interventions and continues to currently play an important role. Indeed, KB has been proposed to optimize stent apposition, improve side branch access while correcting stent deformation or distortion. Over the years, the KB technique has been deeply investigated by many different methods, from bench testing and computer simulations to in vivo intravascular imaging and clinical studies, producing a large amount of data pointing out the benefits and limitations of the technique. We sought to provide here a comprehensive overview of all those aspects.

show abstract

“…Despite previous evidence (23,26,27) suggesting that a SB-MV or SB-MV-SB sequence is suitable post-dilation after provisional stenting, clinical data evaluating this alternative for stent optimization are still needed. Study limitations.…”

Section: Strut Malapposition and Thrombosis Riskmentioning

confidence: 94%