“…The 13 C‐NMR spectrum ( Table ) exhibited 25 carbon signals, including one methyl, two methoxy, three methylene, two methine, and four O‐bearing methine groups, one O‐bearing quaternary carbon, two acetal carbons ( δ (C) 95.9 and 104.3), two olefinic carbons ( δ (C) 111.0 and 154.5), two carbonyl carbons ( δ (C) 168.6 and 175.8), together with signals for one glucopyranosyl moiety ( δ (C) 100.0, 75.1, 78.5, 71.8, 78.0, and 63.0). The NMR data of 1 ( Table ) were similar to those of 7 α ‐ O ‐morroniside, except for the chemical shifts of C‐7 ( 1 : δ (C) 104.3; 7 α ‐ O ‐morroniside: δ (C) 96.0), and the extra carbons signals ( δ (C) 38.1 (CH 2 ), 41.1 (CH 2 ), 52.9 (MeO), 71.6 (CH), 75.2 (CH), 76.6 (CH), 76.7 (C) and 175.8 (C=O)), which was closely similar to those of methyl quinate . The 1 H, 1 H‐COSY correlations ( Figure ) (H‐2′ ( δ (H) 2.00–2.02, 2.04–2.06) with H‐3′ ( δ (H) 4.07–4.11), H‐6′ ( δ (H) 1.91–1.96, 2.28–2.33) with H‐5′ ( δ (H) 3.52–3.55), and H‐4′ ( δ (H) 4.12–4.16) with H‐3′ ( δ (H) 4.07–4.11) and H‐5′ ( δ (H) 3.52–3.55)) and the HMBC correlations ( Figure ) (H‐2′ ( δ (H) 2.00–2.02, 2.04–2.06), H‐3′ ( δ (H) 4.07–4.11), H‐5′ ( δ (H) 3.52–3.55), H‐6′ ( δ (H) 1.91–1.96, 2.28–2.33) with the C‐1′ ( δ (C) 76.7), and H‐3′ ( δ (H) 4.07–4.11), H‐5′ ( δ (H) 3.52–3.55) with the C‐4′ ( δ (C) 76.6)) further confirmed the presence of methyl quinate groups.…”