Abstract:This qualitative study aims to explore the core leadership practices of school principals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Given the exploratory nature of this study, a qualitative research design methodology was employed through which an in-depth, multi-perspective study of the practices of four secondary school principals was carried out. Employing a semi-structured interview protocol developed specifically for this study, data was collected from the principals and four teachers and four parents from each of … Show more
“…One notable gap relates to the impact of culture on principals’ leadership and management practices across GCC societies. There is emerging evidence suggesting that culture shapes how school principals conceptualise effective leadership (see Alqahtani et al, 2020) and that specific cultural contexts create specific challenges for school leaders in the region (see Alsaleh, 2019; Hammad and Shah, 2018). Other important gaps include the impact of principal leadership on school operations and outcomes, especially student learning and achievement, as well as the impact of principal leadership on teachers’ professional learning and development.…”
In view of the growing emphasis by educational leadership and management (EDLM) scholars on diversifying the existing knowledge base in the field, this review of research analysed topics and conceptual models employed in 104 studies on school principals from the Arabian Gulf states published between 2000 and 2019. Systematic review methods were used to identify relevant studies documented in Arabic databases hosted by Dar Almandumah. Information was extracted from the articles and analysed using quantitative methods. The results revealed similarities between the data set under review and EDLM research from other developing countries in terms of research topics and conceptual development. Weaknesses are highlighted and recommendations are offered for strengthening future studies on school principals in the region.
“…One notable gap relates to the impact of culture on principals’ leadership and management practices across GCC societies. There is emerging evidence suggesting that culture shapes how school principals conceptualise effective leadership (see Alqahtani et al, 2020) and that specific cultural contexts create specific challenges for school leaders in the region (see Alsaleh, 2019; Hammad and Shah, 2018). Other important gaps include the impact of principal leadership on school operations and outcomes, especially student learning and achievement, as well as the impact of principal leadership on teachers’ professional learning and development.…”
In view of the growing emphasis by educational leadership and management (EDLM) scholars on diversifying the existing knowledge base in the field, this review of research analysed topics and conceptual models employed in 104 studies on school principals from the Arabian Gulf states published between 2000 and 2019. Systematic review methods were used to identify relevant studies documented in Arabic databases hosted by Dar Almandumah. Information was extracted from the articles and analysed using quantitative methods. The results revealed similarities between the data set under review and EDLM research from other developing countries in terms of research topics and conceptual development. Weaknesses are highlighted and recommendations are offered for strengthening future studies on school principals in the region.
“…Several researchers (Aas and Brandmo, 2016; Daniels et al, 2019; Leithwood et al, 2020) argued that leadership practices should be studied from an integrative perspective, combining theories such as those of instructional, distributed and transformational leadership, instead of studying solely one fixed leadership theory. For instance, Alqahtani et al (2020) and Noman et al (2018) chose the integrative perspective of leadership practices and explored the leadership practices of school principals in Saudi Arabia and Malaysia respectively. In addition to this focus on leadership practices, Leithwood et al’s (2020) review showed that there is little understanding of how school principals enact leadership practices, and they call for further exploration of how school principals enact certain practices.…”
School principals and teachers are expected to continuously innovate their practices in changing school environments. These innovation processes can be shared more widely through collaboration between principals and teachers, i.e. collaborative innovation. In order to gain more insight into how school principals enact their leadership practices in leading collaborative innovation, we interviewed 22 school principals of primary, secondary and vocational education in the Netherlands. All participants have implemented the same collaborative innovation programme, aimed at enhancement of collaboration between teachers and school principals within schools, that has already been implemented by 900 Dutch schools. They were interviewed twice during the implementation year. Interview transcripts were analysed using an open coding strategy looking for leadership practices. Based on 11 leadership practices, we described two main leadership patterns: school principals enacting leadership practices as either a team player or as a facilitator. We conclude that our findings suggest a wider repertoire of leadership practices than is reported in previous studies. Future studies would need to address the generalisability of the practices and patterns as found in this specific context of collaborative innovation.
“…Here, HEIs are recognized to involve formal and informal rules of the game, embedded within which is the notion of gender as a binary social construct, involving appropriate (expected) actions on the role and identity of biological men and women (Al Alhareth et al., 2015). In terms of actors in Saudi Arabia's HEIs, the behaviors of both women and men are often shaped by the institutional practices and norms and stereotypical attitudes and behaviors, thereby posing issues and challenges for women's leadership (Alqahtani, 2021). In terms of the context, Saudi Arabia's HEIs do not function in a vacuum and are not immune to influences from the country's male‐dominated political, social, cultural, and economic environment (Lebeau & Alruwaili, 2021).…”
This paper explores women's leadership in Saudi Arabia's three university settings—gender segregated (women or men‐only), unsegregated (co‐educational) and the majority of partially segregated universities where women's campuses exist within male‐dominated universities. While Saudi Arabia's accelerated reforms are creating new opportunities for women's leadership, these are not reflected in the higher education sector yet. In adopting a feminist institutional theory perspective, this study employed a feminist qualitative approach, including 14 semi‐structured interviews in Saudi Arabia's three university settings. The findings revealed that the barriers to women's leadership were most significant within the partially segregated universities, rendering women leaders as effectively powerless. In contrast, women's leadership flourished in the women‐only university setting. As such, the findings suggest that the dominating partially segregated model is ineffective and problematic for women's leadership, and contradict the dominant view that gender segregation disempowers women. These insights have implications for the transformation of Saudi Arabia's higher education sector, aligned with the Kingdom's Vision 2030 policy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.