2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8dt02197j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination-induced reversible electrical conductivity variation in the MOF-74 analogue Fe2(DSBDC)

Abstract: DMF coordination to Fe centers induces partial electron transfer and improves electrical conductivity in Fe2(DSBDC) by three orders of magnitude.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference was hypothesized to be the result of defects introduced by the solvent exchange and evacuation process. Removal of coordinated DMF in Fe 2 (DSBDC) was found to further reduce 115 the conductivity by an additional 2 orders of magnitude to 1.5 × 10 –9 S/cm. DFT calculations indicated that coordinated DMF accepts electron density from Fe centers, effectively hole-doping the material and increasing charge density.…”
Section: Through-bond Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference was hypothesized to be the result of defects introduced by the solvent exchange and evacuation process. Removal of coordinated DMF in Fe 2 (DSBDC) was found to further reduce 115 the conductivity by an additional 2 orders of magnitude to 1.5 × 10 –9 S/cm. DFT calculations indicated that coordinated DMF accepts electron density from Fe centers, effectively hole-doping the material and increasing charge density.…”
Section: Through-bond Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localized charges with discrete energy levels hop between favorable neighboring units. For instance, M 2 (DOBDC) (M = Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ ) 12 and Fe‐MOF‐74 11 both rely on the hopping of specific site charges. The through‐space conduction also depends on the charge transport between the donor and the acceptor.…”
Section: Structural and Electronic Characteristics Of Conductive Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of hard or borderline Lewis acids, such as zirconium(IV) or zinc(II), with linkers possessing thioether groups ortho to the dicarboxylate donors typically leads to the formation of UiO [ 32 ] or IRMOF structure types [ 33 ], in which the sulfur donors are not employed due to the coordination mismatch. For the mercapto-containing linker 2,5-dimercaptobenzene dicarboxylic acid (DMBDC), MOF-74, and UiO analogues were prepared with Fe and Zr as the metals, respectively [ 34 , 35 ]. In the case of the 2,5-bis(allylsulfanyl)benzene dicarboxylic acid (ASBDC) linker, we reasoned that the use of silver(I) as a metal node, with its coordination preference for soft thioether donors, might lead to more highly coordinated silver centers and a stable structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%