2010 IEEE 7th International Conference on E-Business Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icebe.2010.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination in a Two-Level Green Supply Chain with Environment-Conscious and Price-Sensitive Customers: A Nash Equilibrium View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cooperation between players can be studied using the basic concept of Nash equilibrium developed in non-cooperative GT (Nash, 1951). Various studies investigate the game process of a GSC and provide a Nash equilibrium solution under decentralized channel policy (Xie, 2016; Chen et al, 2010; Barari et al , 2012; Ghosh and Shah, 2012). This means that the assumption of a sequential game is removed and it is assumed that the supplier and the buyer to determine the optimal policy by playing a strategic game.…”
Section: Methodological Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooperation between players can be studied using the basic concept of Nash equilibrium developed in non-cooperative GT (Nash, 1951). Various studies investigate the game process of a GSC and provide a Nash equilibrium solution under decentralized channel policy (Xie, 2016; Chen et al, 2010; Barari et al , 2012; Ghosh and Shah, 2012). This means that the assumption of a sequential game is removed and it is assumed that the supplier and the buyer to determine the optimal policy by playing a strategic game.…”
Section: Methodological Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there has been less emphasis on the interactions among the various stakeholders within the SC, and how they affect the relationship between green awareness and product sales. For example, Chen (2010) proposed a Nash equilibrium model for SC coordination with environmentally-conscious and price-sensitive customers; other studies look at product preferences and their effects on the carbon footprint (Du et al, 2015), environmentally sensitive customers (Altmann, 2015), and environmentally aware consumers (Giri and Bardhan, 2016). Zhang et al (2013) applies game theory to a three-level SC system in which market demand correlates to the product's "greenness", and Xu and Xie (2016) took the impact of products' eco-friendly level on demand and constructed a two-stage closed-loop supply chain composed by a single manufacturer and a single retailer.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordination among stakeholders is the key to the success of the green supply chain management, with game theory as the most popular methodology (c.f. Azevedo et al, 2011;Barari et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2010;Chen and Sheu, 2009;Guide et al, 2000). For example, Maiti and Giri (2017) proposed decentralized (Nash game), manufacture-led and retailer-led Stackelberg games, and centralized (cooperative game) structures to analyze the two-way product recovery in a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akyuz and Erkan (2010) summarised a number of remaining challenges regarding performance measurement in the supply chain, including the need to better address the issues of partnerships (Duffy and Fearne, 2004) and collaboration (Min et al , 2005) between suppliers and manufacturers. Chen et al (2010) explored the issue of coordination in a two‐level supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer, and customers. However, their analysis highlights several opportunities for further research in that they did not consider inventory costs, did not compare coordinated and uncoordinated scenarios, and did not adequately address the complexities of investment associated with sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our review of the literature showed that there is no analytical model available that considers sustainability in a supply‐chain context (e.g. Jaber and Zolfaghari, 2008; Ben‐Daya et al , 2008; Defee et al , 2010; Chen et al , 2010; Glock, 2012). However, a relevant work to the paper is that of El Saadany et al (2011) who attempted at developing a method to quantify the quality of the environmental performance of a supply chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%