1994
DOI: 10.2307/2393236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination and Control in a Government Agency: Contingency and Institutional Theory Perspectives on GAO Audits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
110
0
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
110
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The task environment is thought of as the context immediately surrounding the organization, which is often described as stable versus dynamic; simple versus complex (see Gupta, et al, 1994). It is also assumed to include organizations, which directly influence the goal setting and goal achievement of an organization (Lenz and Engledow, 1986).…”
Section: Contingency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task environment is thought of as the context immediately surrounding the organization, which is often described as stable versus dynamic; simple versus complex (see Gupta, et al, 1994). It is also assumed to include organizations, which directly influence the goal setting and goal achievement of an organization (Lenz and Engledow, 1986).…”
Section: Contingency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional theory explains that organizations that are dependent upon the government have the disposition to adopt a bureaucratic form of control, because this is the prescript within government: bureaucracy is the 'taken-for-granted' form of organization (Gupta et al, 1994). Hasenfeld and Powell (2004) show that English non-profit organizations, being involved in the delivery of reemployment services, adopted their original practices to the dominant institutional norms, rules and cognitive schema of the policy that was designed by government.…”
Section: Institutional Theory and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of institutional pressures in the adoption and conformity to a particularly mandated system can be particularly powerful in government organizations (Carruthers, 1995;Brignall and Modell, 2000;Lapsley and Pallot, 2000), taking into account that the survival of these organizations is primarily dependent on the support of external stakeholders and not the actual performance (Gupta et al, 1994;Geiger and Ittner, 1996).…”
Section: Performance Management and The Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%