2018
DOI: 10.5553/bk/092733872018027001011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User co-production of public service delivery: Effects on trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
(335 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-production is expected to enhance the relationship between citizens and public servants and to become a mechanism for increasing responsiveness and tailoring services to personal needs (Vanleene, Voets, and Verschuere 2017). Finally, co-production is expected to enhance democratization, since it is seen as a source of citizen empowerment (Fledderus 2015). Specifically for social care services, Ross, Needham and Carr (2013) define a set of values that care coproduction should attain: equality, diversity, accessibility, and reciprocity.…”
Section: Co-production As a Means For Realizing Public Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-production is expected to enhance the relationship between citizens and public servants and to become a mechanism for increasing responsiveness and tailoring services to personal needs (Vanleene, Voets, and Verschuere 2017). Finally, co-production is expected to enhance democratization, since it is seen as a source of citizen empowerment (Fledderus 2015). Specifically for social care services, Ross, Needham and Carr (2013) define a set of values that care coproduction should attain: equality, diversity, accessibility, and reciprocity.…”
Section: Co-production As a Means For Realizing Public Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-production is often expected to improve the creation of public outcomes that are difficult to attain in regular public service delivery, as co-production is expected to make service delivery more efficient (through making better use of resources), more responsive, more inclusive, etc. (Pestoff, 2006;Fledderus, 2016;Verschuere et al, 2012;Vanleene et al, 2017;Jaspers and Steen, 2019;Ross et al, 2013). Our critical view, however, focuses on the sustainability of public outcomes that are co-created.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%