Cooperation and end‐to‐end in the Internet

Abstract

Summary This paper analyzes the motivation and strategies for ensuring cooperative behavior among hosts and customer networks in the Internet and 5G networks. The hypothesis is that better cooperation among the benevolent entities could improve the overall Internet welfare, motivating the need for adoption of cooperative security. However, in state of the art, the prevalent security approach in the Internet is based on self‐help, while the adoption of cooperative methods is progressing slowly. At the same time, the ubiquitous reliance on 5G and mission critical nature of some of the new services, for example, ultrareliable (machine‐to‐machine) communication and Internet of things, requires that 5G will do its best to curb the malicious (noncooperative) behavior from becoming a cause of failure to the legitimate services. In this paper, we relate our analysis of the conditions for sustainable cooperation in the Internet with the famous end‐to‐end principle, and present the hypothesis that there is no end‐to‐end solution to the problem of ensuring cooperation among Internet hosts. Game theory allows studying the outcomes of interactions among the players with conflicting interests. We use it to study the hypothesis and show that introducing the reputation of Internet nodes and customer networks can lead to cooperation, which improves the overall Internet welfare and reduces the payoffs of malicious actors. We study the possible response of noncooperative users with advanced defection strategies and the resulting outcomes. We argue that 5G shall make significant progress towards uprooting the selfish behavior and malicious activities using cooperation and relate it with motivation for providing ubiquitous connectivity and ultrareliable services. The paper concludes by summarizing our earlier work on the application of the proposed methods of cooperation to 5G and the Internet; outlining how cooperation in security is not only desirable but also feasible.

Improving Security of Future Networks Using Enhanced Customer Edge Switching and Risk-Based Analysis

“…CETP can also exchange queries and inform other CES nodes about malicious traffic. Hence, it is able to block the transmission as close to the source of traffic as it is possible which is desired as otherwise a significant volume of unwanted traffic may be transmitted within the defended network [15].…”

SOS: Socially omitting selfishness in IoT for smart and connected communities

“…The nodes having a variable relationship with neighbor nodes may forward messages to their friends and refuse to forward messages to the strangers. The selfish behavior of the node has an adverse effect on the throughput of the network and can affect the performance of the network by losing connectivity 16 . In this article, the problem of selfishness, either individual or social, has been considered to design a scheme that can omit the selfishness using a social mechanism of election in SCC.…”