2020
DOI: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202006233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convalescent plasma therapy of a new coronavirus infection: an experience of Moscow city hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies, no statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed [21,22,26,28,29,31,33,37,39,40,42,44,46,49,52,53]. In contrast, other studies showed benefits of CovCP in terms of disease progression [23,25,27], mitigation of hypoxia [30], World Health Organization (WHO) severity score [32], respiratory parameters [24,54], rate and time to clinical improvement [20,34], need for intubation [50], extubation rate [35], recovery time from critical illness [55], rate of MV and vasopressor support [51], rate of transfer to MV [41], and clinical status [38] in the overall study population or specific subgroups of patients with COVID-19.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, no statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed [21,22,26,28,29,31,33,37,39,40,42,44,46,49,52,53]. In contrast, other studies showed benefits of CovCP in terms of disease progression [23,25,27], mitigation of hypoxia [30], World Health Organization (WHO) severity score [32], respiratory parameters [24,54], rate and time to clinical improvement [20,34], need for intubation [50], extubation rate [35], recovery time from critical illness [55], rate of MV and vasopressor support [51], rate of transfer to MV [41], and clinical status [38] in the overall study population or specific subgroups of patients with COVID-19.…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%