2013
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201300881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the Interaction of Light with Polymer Semiconductors

Abstract: In this study, a generally applicable strategy is described to manipulate the optical properties of a wide range of polymer semiconductors in the solid state. Blending these materials with a non-conjugated, polar polymer matrix is found to be the processing key to a drastic change and red-shift of the absorption characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(20 reference statements)
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 When blending the three polymers with high molecular weight PEO (viscosity averaged molecular weight M v = 900 kg mol -1 ), following the procedures reported in Refs. 20 and 38, we find that adding PEO to the P3HT homopolymer leads to a substantially enhanced 0-0/0-1 peak ratio in both absorption and emission, entirely consistent with earlier observations 20 and characteristic of a transition from inter-to intra-molecular coupling 26,29,31 similar changes in neat P3HT were previously attributed to polar solvent induced planarization in solution prior to aggregation. 39,40 In contrast, blending the block copolymer P3HT-b-PEO with PEO has a negligible effect on the optical response of this P3HT copolymer.…”
Section: Results and Disucssionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 When blending the three polymers with high molecular weight PEO (viscosity averaged molecular weight M v = 900 kg mol -1 ), following the procedures reported in Refs. 20 and 38, we find that adding PEO to the P3HT homopolymer leads to a substantially enhanced 0-0/0-1 peak ratio in both absorption and emission, entirely consistent with earlier observations 20 and characteristic of a transition from inter-to intra-molecular coupling 26,29,31 similar changes in neat P3HT were previously attributed to polar solvent induced planarization in solution prior to aggregation. 39,40 In contrast, blending the block copolymer P3HT-b-PEO with PEO has a negligible effect on the optical response of this P3HT copolymer.…”
Section: Results and Disucssionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This difference was tentatively attributed to a change in the torsional backbone order of P3HT. 20 Here, we aim at combining these two approacheschemical modification and blending -to control the molecular order of the active material and, thus, functionality. For this, we use model systems with the same conjugated backbone based on polythiophene chains -the P3HT homopolymer, the diblock copolymer poly(3-hexylthiophene)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (P3HT-b-PEO), 25 and the graft polymer poly[3but(ethylene oxide)thiophene] (P3BEOT; for chemical structures see Figure 1b,c insets) -and their blends with PEO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paquin et al (36) and Parkinson et al (37) both have revealed a dynamic evolution from an initial vibrationally hot excited state (low symmetry) to a geometrically relaxed state (high symmetry) (i.e., dynamic torsional planarization of the backbones) for P3HT, which results in a dynamic and strong decrease of the relative 0-0 intensity within ∼10 ps. With time-resolved absorption measurements, Ade and coworkers have reported the interchain coupling involves a dynamic process evolving from J-like to H-like within a few hundreds of picoseconds for P3HT in polyethylene oxide matrix * (38). In the H-aggregate model (25,36), the 0-0 transition from the first excited state to the ground state is symmetry forbidden and the emission can be described by a modified Franck-Condon progression:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large redshift of the absorption maxima to 550–600 nm in the spin‐coated films is generally observed because of the planarization of the π‐conjugated chain; however, the disordered packing means that the side‐by‐side interchain interaction dominates the electronic properties of the films (weak H ‐aggregation model) . This situation can be changed if the polymer chains form highly ordered and planar structures, then the head‐to‐tail interaction could be strong enough to determine the optical properties, as observed in highly crystalline nanofibers, single crystals, or crystallized films in a poly(ethylene oxide) matrix, where a more significant redshift of the absorption to 640 nm is observed ( J ‐aggregation). These recent results suggest that the same π‐conjugated polymers can show completely different optical properties depending on the structural order and the packing of the main chains in the films…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%