2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87473-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Packet Drops to Improve Freshness of Information

Abstract: Many systems require frequent and regular updates of a certain information. These updates have to be transferred regularly from the source to the destination. We consider scenarios in which an old packet becomes completely obsolete, in the presence of a new packet. In this context, if a new packet arrives at the source while it is transferring a packet, one needs to decide the packet to be dropped. New packet has recent information, but might require more time to transfer. Thus it is not clear as to which pack… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, since the system becomes empty after the occurrence of this transition, the second component of the age vector x(t) becomes irrelevant, and thus its corresponding value in the updated age vector xA l is 0. Now, recall that in order to use (8) to derive the MGF of AoI at the destination, one needs to find a non-negative limit vq , ∀q ∈ Q, satisfying (6). It can be shown that this condition holds for all of the considered queueing disciplines studied in this paper by solving the set of equations in (6).…”
Section: A Eh Is Only Allowed When the System Is Emptymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, since the system becomes empty after the occurrence of this transition, the second component of the age vector x(t) becomes irrelevant, and thus its corresponding value in the updated age vector xA l is 0. Now, recall that in order to use (8) to derive the MGF of AoI at the destination, one needs to find a non-negative limit vq , ∀q ∈ Q, satisfying (6). It can be shown that this condition holds for all of the considered queueing disciplines studied in this paper by solving the set of equations in (6).…”
Section: A Eh Is Only Allowed When the System Is Emptymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In [6], the average peak AoI was also analyzed for several queueing disciplines when a status update delivery error may occur probabilistically. The authors of [7]- [9] demonstrated that the achievable average values of AoI and peak AoI could be improved by: i) introducing deadlines for status updates waiting in the queue for service [7], ii) controlling status update drops (when arriving status updates find the server busy) [8], and iii) introducing a waiting duration before service (for the M/G/1 queue under LCFS-WP and LCFS-PW) [9]. The average AoI and average peak AoI were also analyzed for various discrete time queueing systems in [10] under FCFS and LCFS disciplines.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From ( 7) and (10), when the first element of the continuous state x(t) represents the AoI at the destination node, the expectation and the MGF of AoI at the destination node respectively converge to:…”
Section: Problem Statement and Solution Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-dependent preemptive policies have been studied in [22]- [24] for various system settings. It is shown in [22] that within a class of stationary Markov policies where the decision only depends on the instantaneous AoI at the destination, persistent policies such as to always drop the new update or the old update is optimal for certain service time distributions. Our setup is different from [22] in the sense that: 1) the service time (i.e., transmission time of each update) has a specific distribution that is not captured in [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [22] that within a class of stationary Markov policies where the decision only depends on the instantaneous AoI at the destination, persistent policies such as to always drop the new update or the old update is optimal for certain service time distributions. Our setup is different from [22] in the sense that: 1) the service time (i.e., transmission time of each update) has a specific distribution that is not captured in [22]. 2) Our policy is not only dependent on the AoI at the destination, but also on the age of the unfinished update and the number of successfully delivered symbols of it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%