2014
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2014.974871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled release of therapeutics using interpenetrating polymeric networks

Abstract: A large number of IPNs and semi-IPNs have been reported in the literature. The present review is focused on the preparation methods and their CR properties with reference to anticancer, anti-asthmatic, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, anti-tuberculosis and antihypertensive drugs, as majority of these drugs have been reported to be the ideal choices for using IPNs and semi-IPNs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was expected that if the NIPAAM monomer and PEGDA crosslinker were polymerized in the presence of PEG in solution, that better PEG entanglement would be achieved than the analogous polymerization in the presence of the unmodified antibody. It was thought that PEG would form an interpenetrating polymer network with the PEGDA–NIPAAM network, which would result in slower diffusion of a PEGylated protein from the PEGDA crosslinked NIPAAM network than the unmodified protein (that is unable to become entangled in the hydrogel network). There would be better compatibility between the PEGDA crosslinked NIPAAM and PEG compared to the unmodified protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was expected that if the NIPAAM monomer and PEGDA crosslinker were polymerized in the presence of PEG in solution, that better PEG entanglement would be achieved than the analogous polymerization in the presence of the unmodified antibody. It was thought that PEG would form an interpenetrating polymer network with the PEGDA–NIPAAM network, which would result in slower diffusion of a PEGylated protein from the PEGDA crosslinked NIPAAM network than the unmodified protein (that is unable to become entangled in the hydrogel network). There would be better compatibility between the PEGDA crosslinked NIPAAM and PEG compared to the unmodified protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogels are prepared from hydrophilic polymers with a threedimensional (3D) network that are capable of uptaking large volumes of water without dissolving. [1][2][3] In particular, stimuliresponsive hydrogels, also termed intelligent hydrogels, which can undergo a reversible phase transition in response to a great deal of external stimuli including temperature, 4 light, 5 pH, 6 electric eld, 7 have attracted considerable attention in medical and biological applications. 8,9 Of these intelligent hydrogel materials, the pH-responsive ones are widely investigated because the pH value is a crucial environmental factor in human bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To elongate the shelf-life, a combination of plasticizers like glycerol:sorbitol [44] and glycerol:sucrose [45] were studied. To prepare IPNFs, additional to the mixture described above, 0.5 wt % one of PVA [38,46], PEG [47] or HEC [48] was added as shown in Table 1. The resulting solution was than casted on circular templates (8 mm diameter) and left at ambient conditions to dry for 24 h. The dried films were then peeled off (8 mm diameter ×100 μm thickness) and dipped in GA aqueous solutions of different volume ratios (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 vol %) for 6 h at 4 °C to cross-link.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%