1998
DOI: 10.1021/jf9802676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Foam Formation by Antifoam during Demineralization of Crustacean Shell in Preparation of Chitin

Abstract: The effects of antifoam on the control of foam formation during the demineralization of crab shell in the preparation of chitin were evaluated. Foam formation was markedly controlled by addition of antifoam and decreased with increasing antifoam concentrations. At 1.00 mL of antifoam/L of 1 N HCl, the performance of antifoam was more efficient during demineralization with smaller shell particle size (<0.425 mm) and under a slightly faster stirring speed (300 rpm). Deproteinization followed by demineralization … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shrimp chitosan sample showed 427.98% FBC which is in agreement with those (314 to 535% with an average of 417%) reported by No et al (1998). Rout (2001) reported that changing the sequence of steps (such as an increased in FBC is observed when demineralization is conducted prior to deproteinization, followed by deacetylation and decreased FBC is observed when deproteinization is performed prior to demineralization, followed by deacetylation).…”
Section: Fat Binding Capacitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Shrimp chitosan sample showed 427.98% FBC which is in agreement with those (314 to 535% with an average of 417%) reported by No et al (1998). Rout (2001) reported that changing the sequence of steps (such as an increased in FBC is observed when demineralization is conducted prior to deproteinization, followed by deacetylation and decreased FBC is observed when deproteinization is performed prior to demineralization, followed by deacetylation).…”
Section: Fat Binding Capacitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Crustacean shell contains 30–50% calcium carbonate (Johnson & Peniston, ). During demineralisation of crustacean shell with dilute HCl acid, excessive undesirable foams are formed by CO 2 generation (No & Hur, ). In this study, however, no foam formation was observed during demineralisation of squid pen, which would certainly accelerate the processing rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of noble minerals is CaCO3 and Ca3(PO4)2 in small quantities, the minerals contained in this carapace are easier compared to proteins because they are only physically bound (Kumari et al, 2017). Demineralization is generally performed by acid treatment using HCl, HNO3, H2SO4, CH3COOH, and HCOOH (No and Hur, 1998;Percot et al, 2003). Among these acids, the preferential reagent is dilute hydrochloric acid.…”
Section: Isolation Of Chitinmentioning
confidence: 99%