2007
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.200700945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of a boundary layer separation

Abstract: The results of experimental study on a boundary layer separation control are given in the paper. The boundary layer on a flat wall is subjected to adverse pressure gradient. The active control strategy evolving a synthetic jet has been applied. The separation process is investigated using TR-PIV method. Dynamical aspects of the phenomenon are analyzed in details.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() show that the extent of the flow separation region varies according to incident wind velocity so it may be that the change in either incident velocity or direction may have produced a change in the flow structure over the scarp. Separated flows above forward‐facing steps or scarps are also characterised by a flapping motion particularly in the high shear layer along the surface of the separation envelope or region, so it is possible to have fluctuating velocities along that zone (Largeau and Moriniere, ; Uruba and Knob, ; Pearson et al, ). As the wind direction veered towards almost perpendicular onshore after ~12.30 pm, the highest placed anemometer at the scarp crest tended to display the highest velocities (Figure (b)).…”
Section: Three Dimensional (3d) Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…() show that the extent of the flow separation region varies according to incident wind velocity so it may be that the change in either incident velocity or direction may have produced a change in the flow structure over the scarp. Separated flows above forward‐facing steps or scarps are also characterised by a flapping motion particularly in the high shear layer along the surface of the separation envelope or region, so it is possible to have fluctuating velocities along that zone (Largeau and Moriniere, ; Uruba and Knob, ; Pearson et al, ). As the wind direction veered towards almost perpendicular onshore after ~12.30 pm, the highest placed anemometer at the scarp crest tended to display the highest velocities (Figure (b)).…”
Section: Three Dimensional (3d) Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where the slope is lower than ~55° to 60°, basal flow separation does not occur, and speedup is common as the flow moves upslope (Jensen and Petersen, 1968; Bowen and Lindley, , ; Tsoar, ; Emeis et al, ). Above those slope gradients, the development of a turbulent reversing vortex within a flow separation region or envelope at the base of the scarp is common (Uruba and Knob, ; Pires et al, , ; Qian et al, ). The point at which flow separation occurs upstream is around –0.8 h to –1.2 h where h is the scarp height according to Pearson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow separation region upwind of the scarp/slope is inherently turbulent and unsteady (Uruba and Knob, 2009). The degree of upwind turbulence and pressure increases with increasing slope (Xianwan et al, 1999), and the extent of flow separation depends on the Reynolds number (Hattori and Nagano, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulence intensity of both streamwise and transverse velocity fluctuations increases as step/scarp height increases, and the downwind length of the separation region increases with step height (Abu-Mulaweh, 2005). The average re-attachment length of the separation region on the scarp or step plateau or terrace depends on the incident velocity (Largeau and Moriniere, 2007), but is variable due to the flapping behaviour (low frequency fluctuations) or unsteady motion of the shear layer above the separation region (Largeau and Moriniere, 2007;Uruba and Knob 2009;Pearson et al, 2013). This flapping motion is related to the ejection of flow within the separated region (Sherry et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%