Contributors and Free-Riders in Collaborative Governance: A Computational Exploration of Social Motivation and Its Effects

Choi, Taehyon; Robertson, Peter J.

doi:10.1093/jopart/muy068

Cited by 25 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In large groups, it can also be quite 'fuzzy' who is 'in' and who is 'out' of the network, producing instability (Everingham, Warburton, Cuthill, & Bartlett, 2012;Nahon, 2011) Greater inclusion may also increase the number of potentially uncooperative participants (Nowell, 2010;Scott, Thomas, & Magallanes, 2019) or the number of potential veto points (Newig et al, 2018). Getting to 'yes' in inclusive forums may take more effort, time and risk as stakeholders often have varied commitments to collaboration, and social loafing and other forms of strategic behaviour are more likely to occur in larger group settings (Choi & Robertson, 2019;Feiock, 2009;Johnston, Hicks, Nan, & Auer, 2010). For these reasons, collaborative processes may be more successful if inclusion is more strategic and selective.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Who should be included in collaborative governance and how they should be included is an important topic, though the dynamics of inclusion are not yet well understood. We propose a conceptual model to shape the empirical analysis of what contributes to inclusion in collaborative processes. We propose that incentives, mutual interdependence and trust are important preconditions of inclusion, but that active inclusion management also matters a great deal. We also hypothesize that inclusion is strategic, with 'selective activation' of participants depending on functional and pragmatic choices. Drawing on cases from the Collaborative Governance Case Databank, we used a mixed method approach to analyse our model. We found support for the model, and particularly for the central importance of active inclusion management.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(RQ 1) What sectors in public services have implemented collaborative governance? (Zubair et al, 2017), (Ward et al, 2018), (Thiarai et al, 2019), (Scott & Gilson, 2017), (Bekker et al, 2018), (Moscou & Kohler, 2017), (Kamugumya & Olivier, 2016), (Kim, 2015), (Jobson et al, 2017), (Rensburg et al, 2018), (Gifford et al, 2017), (Broom et al, 2016), (Bordier et al, 2018), (Addison et al, 2016), (Nóbrega et al, 2018) (Webster & Cheyne, 2017), (Supromin & Choonhakhlai, 2017), (Papamichail et al, 2018), (Galli et al, 2019), (Fathimath, 2017), (Choi & Robertson, 2018), (Brinks, 2018), (Vilkė et al, 2018).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Governance In Public Service In Indonesia: A Systematic Mapping Study

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research raises a problem in Indonesia’s public services, with its relation to the scope of Public Administration Science. The study aims to analyze research articles in international journals with a time span from 2015 to 2019. The databases that the researchers used in the preparation of these scientific articles are Scopus and Taylor and Francis Group, which already have recognition from academics internationally. This study uses a qualitative research method with a literature review approach model in the form of a systematic mapping study. The research concludes that collaborative governance is most widely applied in public services, especially in the health sector. In addition, the method most commonly used is qualitative research methods with a case study approach

show abstract

“…Users are free to choose to write blog posts, comment on content, modify Wiki articles, upload their photos, or take passive actions to show inaction. Moreover, the punishment of noncontributors is unlikely to be a viable option, especially in the case of voluntary participation; such behavior may cause the punished participants to withdraw, thereby destroying the system [10].…”

Section: Passive Users Vs Lurkersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Users who produce little or no content and perform other activities (e.g., reading) quietly are called "lurkers" and their behavior is called "lurking" [8,9]. As the phenomenon of users lurking on the internet has become universal, research has been conducted regarding personal characteristics [10], information privacy [9], role perspective [11], transactional distance, and interaction types [12]. A study on social media established that the lurking degree of lurkers in the network is different [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are Online Parasites Really Different from Lurkers?

Bu¹,

Lou²,

Koh

2021

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the development of digital technology, the internet environment has dramatically changed the way people share information, which has been changed by different types of sources, making it convenient to obtain information. The lurking phenomenon in the network is becoming increasingly common, and previous studies have been conducted on lurkers on the internet with shifting focus from active users to passive users. Under these circumstances, this tries to conceptualize a new type of passive users, titled as "online parasites" who focus on obtaining information by utilizing the internet or their host to achieve their other purposes. The aim is to deeply understand these users and clearly distinguish them from other types of users such as lurkers.

show abstract

Contributors and Free-Riders in Collaborative Governance: A Computational Exploration of Social Motivation and Its Effects

Cited by 25 publications

References 58 publications

Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach

Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach

Collaborative Governance In Public Service In Indonesia: A Systematic Mapping Study

Are Online Parasites Really Different from Lurkers?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About