2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.90.052704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of dielectronic, trielectronic, and metastable channels to the resonant intershell recombination of highly charged silicon ions

Abstract: Intershell, resonant electronic recombination is studied experimentally in an electron-beam ion trap for O-like Si6+ to He-like Si12+ ions at plasma temperatures in the megakelvin range similar to those found in the solar radiative zone and is compared to extended multiconfiguration Dirac-Fock and relativistic configuration-interaction predictions. For this low-Z ion, the higher-order electronic recombination processes are comparable in strength to the first-order one. The ratio of triele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculated resonance energies agree well with the FAC results calculated by Baumann et al, and there is a slight difference less than 0.5% between our results and the multiconfiguration Dirac‐Fock (MCDF) results by Baumann et al and Chen et al For the stronger resonances ( S id >10 −21 cm 2 eV ) , our calculated resonance strengths are closer to the FAC results by Baumann et al and the MCDF results by Chen et al with the difference about 0.5–6.3% and 11.9–26.3%, respectively, except for the [1 s 2 s 2 2 p 1/2 2 p 2 ] 1 (labeled 5) and [1 s 2 s 2 2 p 1/2 2 p 2 ] 1 (labeled 8). However, the MCDF results by Baumann et al differ from our results by 59%. It should be noted that in Table , the two resonance states false[1s2s22p3false/23false]2 (labeled 6) and [1 s 2 s 2 2 p 1/2 2 p 2 ] 2 (labeled 9) correspond to DR and TR processes respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our calculated resonance energies agree well with the FAC results calculated by Baumann et al, and there is a slight difference less than 0.5% between our results and the multiconfiguration Dirac‐Fock (MCDF) results by Baumann et al and Chen et al For the stronger resonances ( S id >10 −21 cm 2 eV ) , our calculated resonance strengths are closer to the FAC results by Baumann et al and the MCDF results by Chen et al with the difference about 0.5–6.3% and 11.9–26.3%, respectively, except for the [1 s 2 s 2 2 p 1/2 2 p 2 ] 1 (labeled 5) and [1 s 2 s 2 2 p 1/2 2 p 2 ] 1 (labeled 8). However, the MCDF results by Baumann et al differ from our results by 59%. It should be noted that in Table , the two resonance states false[1s2s22p3false/23false]2 (labeled 6) and [1 s 2 s 2 2 p 1/2 2 p 2 ] 2 (labeled 9) correspond to DR and TR processes respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that in Table , the two resonance states false[1s2s22p3false/23false]2 (labeled 6) and [1 s 2 s 2 2 p 1/2 2 p 2 ] 2 (labeled 9) correspond to DR and TR processes respectively. But these are misidentified in the study of Baumann et al, which lead to an overestimation of TR contributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[47]. In addition, detailed measurements of recombination resonances have been conducted using x-ray spectroscopy of silicon ions in an electron-beam ion-trap (EBIT) [48]. The previous experimental data for Si 10+ [22] cover a limited range of electron-ion collision energies of 0-43 eV.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%