2017
DOI: 10.3126/jaar.v3i1.16623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Micro-Finance on Socio-Economic Development of Rural Community

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper sought to establish if microfinance services had any relationship with the clients' socioeconomic wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic and the results, in general, indicate that among the microfinance services studied, the client protection policies are a significant predictor of clients' socioeconomic wellbeing when compared to the microfinance social services. The correlation results indicated that microfinance social services do not lead to improved clients' socioeconomic wellbeing contrary to earlier findings of studies done by (Kamiza & Kizza, 2019;Dhakal & Nepal, 2016;Al-Shami et al, 2014;Mokhtar, 2011;Kizza & Ssekibaamu, 2019). The non-significant relationship between microfinance social services and the clients' socioeconomic wellbeing may be explained when we make an analysis of the adoption of the virtual workspace that some MFIs have adopted to reach out to the clientele yet the majority of the clientele are not accustomed to the use of virtual tools.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Policy Recommendationscontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The paper sought to establish if microfinance services had any relationship with the clients' socioeconomic wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic and the results, in general, indicate that among the microfinance services studied, the client protection policies are a significant predictor of clients' socioeconomic wellbeing when compared to the microfinance social services. The correlation results indicated that microfinance social services do not lead to improved clients' socioeconomic wellbeing contrary to earlier findings of studies done by (Kamiza & Kizza, 2019;Dhakal & Nepal, 2016;Al-Shami et al, 2014;Mokhtar, 2011;Kizza & Ssekibaamu, 2019). The non-significant relationship between microfinance social services and the clients' socioeconomic wellbeing may be explained when we make an analysis of the adoption of the virtual workspace that some MFIs have adopted to reach out to the clientele yet the majority of the clientele are not accustomed to the use of virtual tools.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Policy Recommendationscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The point of contention is whether the social efficiency of MFIs can translate into a positive socioeconomic impact on the marginalised and vulnerable groups. Dhakal and Nepal (2016) investigated the contribution of microfinance to the socioeconomic development of a rural community in the Syangja district following a quantitative approach and a cross-sectional study design. The respondents were purposively selected and the perceptual analysis revealed that microfinance significantly contributes to social change and development.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations