2010
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1080.0204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contractual Provisions to Mitigate Holdup: Evidence from Information Technology Outsourcing

Abstract: karhade@ust.hk T he complexity and scope of outsourced information technology (IT) demands relationship-specific investments from vendors, which, when combined with contract incompleteness, may result in underinvestment and inefficient bargaining, referred to as the holdup problem. Using a unique data set of over 100 IT outsourcing contracts, we examine whether contract extensiveness, i.e., the extent to which firms and vendors can foresee contingencies when designing contracts for outsourced IT services, can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For clients, too, the implications of the two-echelon agency problem are relevant. Clients often attempt to write elaborate penalty clauses for different kinds of errors committed by the client's employees-which are very difficult to enforce because of their complexity, as Susarla et al (2010) point out. Instead, it would be preferable for clients to insist that providers share some of the rewards that they receive for higher quality with their employees through quality-linked bonuses.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clients, too, the implications of the two-echelon agency problem are relevant. Clients often attempt to write elaborate penalty clauses for different kinds of errors committed by the client's employees-which are very difficult to enforce because of their complexity, as Susarla et al (2010) point out. Instead, it would be preferable for clients to insist that providers share some of the rewards that they receive for higher quality with their employees through quality-linked bonuses.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted in the context of new system development that project duration is not related to relational duration and contract extendibility (Susarla et al, 2010). While project duration pertains to the delivery of the developed system, other contractual aspects may be related to relational contracting (Joskow, 1987) and to the timeframe for future similar projects (Susarla et al, 2010).…”
Section: Project Size and Contract Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, papers on service contracts appear to focus more on projectbased services-e.g. IT software development (Banerjee and Duflo 2000, Gopal et al 2003, Kalnins and Mayer 2004, Susarla et al 2010, Susarla 2012, and offshore drilling (Corts and Singh 2004). The one-off relationship framed around a project that characterizes projectbased services differs significantly from the dynamics of repeated interactions found in the maintenance industry.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%