Why project size matters for contract choice in software development outsourcing

Abstract

Abstract:The contractual mechanism of software development outsourcing, typically either fixedprice (FP) or time-and-materials (T&M), determines the nature of incentives, risk sharing, and coordination between client and vendor. While software engineering considers project size as crucial for project planning and success, neither economic nor organizational theory considers size per se among the determinants of contract choice. In this paper, we address the gap between the centrality of project size in the software engineering literature and the attention it receives in software contracting research by modeling and testing the association between project size and contract choice. Existing empirical evidence indicates that FP contracts are appropriate for small development efforts whereas T&M contracts are suitable for larger projects, based on the reasoning that cost and schedule are difficult to estimate in larger projects. This prediction that size is directly associated with contract choice is the basis upon which two models are developed. The first model draws on the contracting efficiency approach to hypothesize that the effect of project size on contract choice is mediated by project detail. The second model draws on the contingency approach to software development risk management to hypothesize that the effect of project size on contract choice is moderated by project detail and vendor familiarity. We test these models using a large portfolio of software development contracts entered into by a leading European bank, and the results confirm that both mediation and moderation are at play. Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation 1 Why Project Size Matters for Contract Choice in Software Development Outsourcing AbstractThe contractual mechanism of software development outsourcing, typically either fixed-price (FP) or time-and-materials (T&M), determines the nature of incentives, risk sharing, and coordination between client and vendor. While software engineering considers project size as crucial for project planning and success, neither economic nor organizational theory considers size per se among the determinants of contract choice. In this paper, we address the gap between the centrality of project size in the software engineering literature and the attention it receives in software contracting research by modeling and testing the association between project size and contract choice. Existing empirical evidence indicates that FP contracts are appropriate for small development efforts whereas T&M contracts are suitable for larger projects, based on the reasoning that cost and schedule are difficult to estimate in larger projects. This prediction that size is directly associated with contract choice is the basis upon which two models are developed. The first model draws on the contracting efficiency approach to hypothesize that the effect of project size on contract choice is mediat...

How project description length and expected duration affect bidding and project success in crowdsourcing software development

“…In software outsourcing there are typically only a few bidders on a RFP and the principal knows about software development. That at least was the case in much of the research on the topic (Beulen et al, 2006;Devos et al, 2008;Dibbern et al, 2004;Fink and Lichtenstein, 2014;Goo et al, 2007;Rai et al, 2009;Taylor, 2007). In crowdsourcing, in contrast, there are many agents, they are small contractors, they cannot be sued, their qualification to do the job cannot be verified, and it is not at all certain that the principal knows about outsourcing contracting.…”

“…This may happen because the legal or technical environment has changed and new software aspects are now required or because the buyer realizes it needs more or different specifications. Adverse selection and moral hazard risks have been shown to be major considerations in large sized software outsourcing projects (Ethiraj et al, 2005;Fink and Lichtenstein, 2014;Gopal and Sivaramakrishnan, 2008).…”

“…In contrast, a Time and Materials contract is one where the provider is paid by billable hours and expenses incurred rather than at the product or service delivery milestones. as T&M rather than FP allows for a more even balance of risks between buyer and provider in traditional software outsourcing contracts (Fink and Lichtenstein, 2014;Gopal and Sivaramakrishnan, 2008;Gopal et al, 2003). That option does not exist in CSM where all the risk is borne entirely by the provider.…”

Aligning flexibility with uncertainty in software development arrangements through a contractual typology

“…The size of a software development project, which is reflected in its price, has a strong (Sommerville, 2000) and on its contracting terms in an outsourcing context (Fink and Lichtenstein, 2014). By definition, the predetermined price in FP arrangements is binding.…”

Protection of Customers’ and Suppliers’ Knowledge in Software Development Projects with Fixed-Price Contract: Using Property Rights Theory

“…The supplier shall take the risk for the project failing when working independently. Researchers recommend that in this situation a fixed-price contract (FPC) with a predetermined price for the software system is not suitable for completion of the SDP in line with the expectations of the contractual parties [7,8]. Indeed, the contract influences the success or failure of SDPs [9].…”