Contracting out public participation to external consultants: Observations on epistemic justice

Abstract

Recent years have seen a rapidly growing trend of outsourcing elements of public participation from public institutions to external citizen engagement consultants (CECs). This study examined this phenomenon using the theoretical framework of epistemic in/justice. It is based on a sequential deductive‐inductive analysis of interviews with public administrators, private CECs, and citizens, all involved in participative initiatives in localities across Israel. While previous research on public participation has focused primarily on the dyadic relationship between governing institutions and selected beneficiaries of their services, the findings of the present study enable offering some observations about what happens when this dyad turns into a triad. A critical review of the findings suggests that while outsourcing public participation is often presented using discourses of progress and inclusion, in fact, it may preserve, or even deepen, epistemic injustices, especially for citizens belonging to vulnerable and marginalized communities.

Exploring the Relationship Between Privatization in Public Service Delivery and Coproduction: Evidence from U.S. Local Governments

“…The public accountability challenges of privatization may also diminish public trust toward government, thus creating adverse incentives for citizens to participate in coproducing public services (Beerman, 2001). Levin (2022) documents a rapidly growing trend of local governments outsourcing elements of their public participation functions to external consultants and organizations.…”

“Poster girl”: The discourse constructing the image of “girls in distress” as existential epistemic injustice

“…Not only do performative acts perpetuate existing epistemic hierarchies, but they also limit opportunities for systems to develop mechanisms needed to support virtuous hearing ( 17 ). In the absence of such opportunities, contestation against dominant discourse is easily brushed aside, and the language prevalent in systems becomes so organic to their functioning, that the power relations and epistemic injustices that underlie it become difficult to identify, and even more so contest ( 18 ). Policy can play a vital role in maintaining, shaping, or correcting epistemic injustices.…”

Civics and civility: A darn on threadbare fabric or the fabric itself?

“…Moreover, support for the charity rises among Latinx donors born outside the US who do not speak English at home. Levin (2023) explores the emerging phenomenon of outsourcing public participation from public institutions to external citizen engagement consultants from an epistemic justice framework. Levin finds that expanding the traditional dyad of agencies and stakeholders to a triad that includes private consultants may preserve or deepen epistemic injustices, particularly for citizens who belong to vulnerable or marginalized communities.…”