1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00309221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour effects in figure perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for example, a short familiar word can N be better perceived than each individual letter on its own (Cattell,1885). More recently this superiority effect has been demonstrated for objects as well (Weisstein & Harris, 1974;McClelland, 1978;Wandmacher, 1981). The instances of concurrence benefits are obviously hard to reconcile with the notion of task invariance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…for example, a short familiar word can N be better perceived than each individual letter on its own (Cattell,1885). More recently this superiority effect has been demonstrated for objects as well (Weisstein & Harris, 1974;McClelland, 1978;Wandmacher, 1981). The instances of concurrence benefits are obviously hard to reconcile with the notion of task invariance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%