1986
DOI: 10.21236/ada172682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of Performance Tests: A Proposal for Further Steps.

Abstract: UNCLASSIFIEDApproved for public release; distribution unlimited. • This report summarizes the results of Phase I of a study on the fea jbility .-V.and development of a standardized task battery for measiiement of human performance. Phase I includes literature reviews on task batteries, interviews with experts in the field of human performance and analytic studies of the theoretical background of existing and possible task batteries. Recormendations for a further task battery are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach followed in the development of these batteries includes cognitive theory (Guillion & Eckerman, 1986), a desire to "standardize" (Hegge cited in Sanders, Haywood, Schroiff, & Wauschkuhn, 1986), the need to field a battery which tests the mental functions disrupted by the agents (Baker, et al, 1985) and the opportunity to computerize paper-and-pencil tests (Barrett et al, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach followed in the development of these batteries includes cognitive theory (Guillion & Eckerman, 1986), a desire to "standardize" (Hegge cited in Sanders, Haywood, Schroiff, & Wauschkuhn, 1986), the need to field a battery which tests the mental functions disrupted by the agents (Baker, et al, 1985) and the opportunity to computerize paper-and-pencil tests (Barrett et al, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach followed in the development of these batteries includes, for example, cognitive theory (Guillion & Eckerman, 1986), a desire to standardize (Hegge, cited in Sanders, Haywood, Schroiff, & Wauschkuhn, 1986), the need to field a battery that tests the mental functions disrupted by various agents (Baker et al, 1985), and the opportunity to computerize paper-and-pencil tests (Barrett et al, 1977). To this list we add our own philosophy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%