1989
DOI: 10.21236/ada252353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Performance Tests: Comparison of Psychometric Properties of 24 Tests from Two Microcomputer-Based Batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All subtests have demonstrated reliabilities~0·707, with mean. standard deviation, and differential stability achievable in 8-12 min of practice (Kennedy et al 1989d). Collectively, the nine subtests have been demonstrated to identify four separate factors (Lane and Kennedy 1990) including: motor speed; symbol manipulation/reasoning; cognitive processing speed; and speed of response selection.…”
Section: The Automated Performance Test System (Apts)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All subtests have demonstrated reliabilities~0·707, with mean. standard deviation, and differential stability achievable in 8-12 min of practice (Kennedy et al 1989d). Collectively, the nine subtests have been demonstrated to identify four separate factors (Lane and Kennedy 1990) including: motor speed; symbol manipulation/reasoning; cognitive processing speed; and speed of response selection.…”
Section: The Automated Performance Test System (Apts)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tests in these batteries have been used extensively (Kennedy & Bittner, 1977;Simmons & Kimball, 1982;Naitoh, 1982;Edwards et al, 1985;Reeves & Thorne, 1988;Semple, 1992). These tests show stable reliability and are generally viewed to be valid for the unique factor being measured by each test (Kennedy, Turnage, & Osteen, 1989;Cambridge Cognition Limited, 2005). Three of the tests below (Complex Reaction Time, Logical Reasoning, and Matching to Sample) were administered as they appear in USSOCOM's MRPM (Thomas et al, 1994;Shurtleff et al, 1994).…”
Section: Cognitive Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%