1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19980220)57:4<497::aid-bit14>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous biological waste gas treatment in stirred trickle-bed reactor with discontinuous removal of biomass

Abstract: A new reactor for biological waste gas treatment was developed to eliminate continuous solvents from waste gases. A trickle‐bed reactor was chosen with discontinuous movement of the packed bed and intermittent percolation. The reactor was operated with toluene as the solvent and an optimum average biomass concentration of between 5 and 30 kg dry cell weight per cubic meter packed bed (m3pb). This biomass concentration resulted in a high volumetric degradation rate. Reduction of surplus biomass by stirring and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control strategies suggested are of three types: mechanical, chemical or biological. Mechanical treatment includes bed stirring (Wubker et al, 1997;Laurenzis et al, 1998) or bed back washings with water (counter-current washings), which permit the draining of excess accumulated biomass (Smith et al, 1996). Chemical treatments include dissociation of the chemical binding between the biomass and the bed particle surface either by damage to the biomass by creating nutrient or water deficiency, or utilization of disinfecting agents (Diks et al, 1994;Schonduve et al, 1996;Cox and Deshusses, 1999;Armon et al, 2000;Chen and Stewart, 2000).…”
Section: Biotrickling Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control strategies suggested are of three types: mechanical, chemical or biological. Mechanical treatment includes bed stirring (Wubker et al, 1997;Laurenzis et al, 1998) or bed back washings with water (counter-current washings), which permit the draining of excess accumulated biomass (Smith et al, 1996). Chemical treatments include dissociation of the chemical binding between the biomass and the bed particle surface either by damage to the biomass by creating nutrient or water deficiency, or utilization of disinfecting agents (Diks et al, 1994;Schonduve et al, 1996;Cox and Deshusses, 1999;Armon et al, 2000;Chen and Stewart, 2000).…”
Section: Biotrickling Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, backwashing required high liquid flow rates to obtain full medium fluidization and larger reactor volume to allow for bed expansion during fluidization (Smith et al 1996). Little data have been reported for removing excess biomass by stirring the packed bed (Laurenzis et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include: chemical rinses to physically remove the excess biomass accumulation, limitations of nutrient sources and bioreactor modifications using suitable packing materials [7][8][9][10]. These methods have expanded the range of bioreactor applications for higher VOC concentrations and gas flow rates; however, they often fail to consistently maintain high performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%