2017
DOI: 10.25115/ejrep.v9i23.1429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous assessment in a large group of psychology undergraduates

Abstract: Introduction. A continuous classroom assessment method was applied to a higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Procrastination still remains high but more or less the same as it was at the end of secondary school, with only a very slight and non significant decrease. This effect may be due to the Bologna premises as they lead lecturers to apply a more continuous assessment system, which undoubtedly reduces students' tendency to procrastinate (Clariana et al, 2011). However, in contrast, during the first year in university cheating reaches its maximum peak, and becomes a very common and usual practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Procrastination still remains high but more or less the same as it was at the end of secondary school, with only a very slight and non significant decrease. This effect may be due to the Bologna premises as they lead lecturers to apply a more continuous assessment system, which undoubtedly reduces students' tendency to procrastinate (Clariana et al, 2011). However, in contrast, during the first year in university cheating reaches its maximum peak, and becomes a very common and usual practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, academic cheating shows some similarities with academic procrastination as both are more frequently observed in males than in females and in impulsive students who strongly disagree with academic rules (Anderman, Cupp, & Lane, 2009;Brunell, Staats, Barden, & Hupp, 2011;Karim, Zamzuri, & Nor, 2009;Miller, Murdock, Anderman, & Poindexter, 2007). Moreover, students who tend to plagiarise and cheat get lower grades, show a lower level of conscientiousness and self efficacy and attend lessons less frequently than honest students (Yardley, Domènech, Bates, & Nelson, 2009), characteristics which are also described as usual for procrastinators (Ackerman & Gross, 2005;Clariana et al, 2011;Klassen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Academic Cheatingmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Esta característica se ha venido estudiando en psicología desde la década de los ochenta y ha demostrado ser claramente perjudicial para el aprendizaje académico, tal y como comentan algunos autores desde distintas latitudes (Clariana, Gotzens y Badia, 2011;Clariana, Gotzens, Badia y Cladellas, 2012;Lakshminarayan, Potdar y Reddy, 2013;Lubbers, Van Der Werf, Kuyper y Hendriks, 2010;Moon y Illingworth, 2005, Rothblum, Solomon y Murakami, 1986.…”
Section: Procrastinaciónunclassified