ContactPFP: Protein Function Prediction Using Predicted Contact Information

Abstract

Computational function prediction is one of the most important problems in bioinformatics as elucidating the function of genes is a central task in molecular biology and genomics. Most of the existing function prediction methods use protein sequences as the primary source of input information because the sequence is the most available information for query proteins. There are attempts to consider other attributes of query proteins. Among these attributes, the three-dimensional (3D) structure of proteins is known to be very useful in identifying the evolutionary relationship of proteins, from which functional similarity can be inferred. Here, we report a novel protein function prediction method, ContactPFP, which uses predicted residue-residue contact maps as input structural features of query proteins. Although 3D structure information is known to be useful, it has not been routinely used in function prediction because the 3D structure is not experimentally determined for many proteins. In ContactPFP, we overcome this limitation by using residue-residue contact prediction, which has become increasingly accurate due to rapid development in the protein structure prediction field. ContactPFP takes a query protein sequence as input and uses predicted residue-residue contact as a proxy for the 3D protein structure. To characterize how predicted contacts contribute to function prediction accuracy, we compared the performance of ContactPFP with several well-established sequence-based function prediction methods. The comparative study revealed the advantages and weaknesses of ContactPFP compared to contemporary sequence-based methods. There were many cases where it showed higher prediction accuracy. We examined factors that affected the accuracy of ContactPFP using several illustrative cases that highlight the strength of our method.

Integrating proteomics and metabolomics to elucidate the molecular network regulating of inosine monophosphate-specific deposition in Jingyuan chicken

“…Life phenomena are the result of regulatory processes at 3 levels (transcriptional level, expression regulation, and histone modification), from DNA to mRNA to protein. Therefore, elucidating the biological function of proteins remains a core goal in molecular biology, biochemistry, genetics, and genomics ( Kagaya et al, 2022 ). Proteomics is the study of protein composition, expression, kinetics, and modification in cells under various environmental conditions and physiological processes.…”

Rapid proteome-wide prediction of lipid-interacting proteins through ligand-guided structural genomics

“…Recently, other methods leveraging the structure prediction capabilities of AlphaFold 23 have attempted to use structure to predict protein function. For example, ContactPFP 24 predicts protein functions through contact map alignment, and DeepFRI 25 is a convoluted neural network model trained with contact map and a protein language model. However, these methods use the full structures rather than structural sites that could reveal insights into ligand binding.…”

TEMPROT: protein function annotation using transformers embeddings and homology search

“…On the other hand, the analysis of the specific characteristics of each one is still far from the number of sequenced proteins, mainly due to the effort of time and money required by laboratorial experiments compared to sequencing techniques. Due to this fact, works in the literature have been proposing computational methods to predict this type of information from sequenced proteins, such as secondary structures [ 1 ] and functions [ 2 ], in order to decrease this gap [ 3 ].…”