2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
70
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
70
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature on the acceptability of new food technologies has mainly focused on those that, in actual fact or in the imagination of consumers, substantially modify the characteristics of a particular food, such as GMOs, nanotechnologies etc. It has also shown that consumers: 1) are favorable to food innovations which enhance the quality and nutritional value of food; 2) are critical of technologies which, in their view, require an excessive modification of the original product and could be dangerous to human health and the environment; 3) can be influenced by information, and 4) there are differences between consumers of different countries (Coppola & Verneau, 2014;Cox & Evans, 2008;De Barcellos et al, 2010;Evans, Kermarrec, Sable, & Cox, 2010;Frewer et al, 2011;Matin et al, 2012;Nielsen et al, 2009;Siegrist, 2008;Stampfli, Siegrist, & Kastenholz, 2010;Verbeke, Perez-Cueto, Barcellos, Krystallis, & Grunert, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on the acceptability of new food technologies has mainly focused on those that, in actual fact or in the imagination of consumers, substantially modify the characteristics of a particular food, such as GMOs, nanotechnologies etc. It has also shown that consumers: 1) are favorable to food innovations which enhance the quality and nutritional value of food; 2) are critical of technologies which, in their view, require an excessive modification of the original product and could be dangerous to human health and the environment; 3) can be influenced by information, and 4) there are differences between consumers of different countries (Coppola & Verneau, 2014;Cox & Evans, 2008;De Barcellos et al, 2010;Evans, Kermarrec, Sable, & Cox, 2010;Frewer et al, 2011;Matin et al, 2012;Nielsen et al, 2009;Siegrist, 2008;Stampfli, Siegrist, & Kastenholz, 2010;Verbeke, Perez-Cueto, Barcellos, Krystallis, & Grunert, 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies a shared responsibility of the stakeholders within the farm to fork continuum (producers, processors, trading companies, retailers and consumers) and those closely involved in supporting food safety in the supply chain (competent authorities, industry associations, food scientists). Several studies measured the perceptions of consumers on various aspects of food safety (Sparks & Shepherd, 1994;Grunert, 2005;Tonsor, Schroeder, & Pennings, 2009;Nielsen et al, 2009;Soon-Mi et al, 2011). A limited number of studies on opinions of key stakeholders (experts) on food safety policy are available (van Kleef et al, 2006;Sargeant et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesar de que actualmente no existe ningu´n producto comercial tratado por PEAV, se han desarrollado varios estudios al respecto utilizando diversas metodologı´as: encuestas, entrevistas individualizadas, debates en grupo, etc. (Cardello, Schutz, & Lesher, 2003, 2007Mireaux, Cox, Cotton, & Evans, 2007;Nielsen et al, 2009;Olsen, Grunert, & Sonne, 2010;Sonne et al, 2012). Como era de esperar, los resultados muestran que el consumidor evalu´a en general positivamente los PEAV al tratarse de una tecnologı´a respetuosa con el ambiente y que permite conseguir productos con mejores caracterı´sticas sensoriales que los obtenidos mediante los procesos convencionales (Nielsen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Viabilidad Econo´mica Y Comercialunclassified
“…(Cardello, Schutz, & Lesher, 2003, 2007Mireaux, Cox, Cotton, & Evans, 2007;Nielsen et al, 2009;Olsen, Grunert, & Sonne, 2010;Sonne et al, 2012). Como era de esperar, los resultados muestran que el consumidor evalu´a en general positivamente los PEAV al tratarse de una tecnologı´a respetuosa con el ambiente y que permite conseguir productos con mejores caracterı´sticas sensoriales que los obtenidos mediante los procesos convencionales (Nielsen et al, 2009). Sin embargo, se ha observado que muchos consumidores asocian los PEAV con la electricidad y con ciertas tecnologı´as como la irradiacio´n o las microondas, mostra´ndose preocupados por los posibles efectos perjudiciales para la salud que podrı´an tener estos alimentos (Cardello et al, 2007;Nielsen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Viabilidad Econo´mica Y Comercialunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation