2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(84 reference statements)
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumer's trust in the food industry is measured for four different actors, namely farmers, retailers, food manufacturers and the government. Consumer's perceptions of the degree to which these actors were competent, open, and caring about food safety are assessed through six items per actor, which have been developed and validated by De Jonge et al (2008a;. Items included "Retailers have the competence to control the safety of food", "Retailers are sufficiently open about the safety of food", and "Retailers take good care about the safety of our food".…”
Section: Assessment Of Trust Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consumer's trust in the food industry is measured for four different actors, namely farmers, retailers, food manufacturers and the government. Consumer's perceptions of the degree to which these actors were competent, open, and caring about food safety are assessed through six items per actor, which have been developed and validated by De Jonge et al (2008a;. Items included "Retailers have the competence to control the safety of food", "Retailers are sufficiently open about the safety of food", and "Retailers take good care about the safety of our food".…”
Section: Assessment Of Trust Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In surveys, consumers often express concerns about food safety (De Jonge et al 2008a;Verbeke and Vackier 2004). In particular, meat products are considered a vulnerable category, a fact which can be partially explained by the occurrence of many meat related food safety incidents over the last decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer Confidence in the Safety of Food Instruments was used to evaluate attitude toward food safety incidents under intensive exposure of media [13,14]. Attitude towards food safety included positive and negative aspects; the scale ranged from 26 to 130 and consisted of 26 5-point Likert questions with 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree.…”
Section: Attitude Toward Food Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 attribute into a search attribute (Darby & Karni, 1973). Trust on the information delivered relies not only on the credibility of regulatory authorities but also on the perceived commitment of meat chain stakeholders in complying with AW superior standards (de Jonge et al, 2008;Vanhonacker & Verbeke, 2014). This latest aspect has been studied by Nocella et al (2010Nocella et al ( , 2012 who, in their cross-country study, found that WTP for AW labelling is more influenced by trust toward farmers' compliance with AW practices than other stakeholders (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%