2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-013-9469-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Choice and Farmers’ Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have identified a variety of meanings of local food utilized by consumers, see Table 1. Some of these findings include: energy or transport efficiency [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], food security [35][36][37][38], supporting the local economy [18,[39][40][41]; animal welfare [42]; preservation of open landscapes, culture, and rural development [18,43,44], fosters relationships between the producer and consumer [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] and the opinion that local food is fresher and healthier than conventional food [54][55][56][57]. Alongside the plurality of consumer opinions about local food [58] meanings of local food also differ among entities in the food systems, and may relate to their objectives within the food system.…”
Section: Starting Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have identified a variety of meanings of local food utilized by consumers, see Table 1. Some of these findings include: energy or transport efficiency [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], food security [35][36][37][38], supporting the local economy [18,[39][40][41]; animal welfare [42]; preservation of open landscapes, culture, and rural development [18,43,44], fosters relationships between the producer and consumer [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] and the opinion that local food is fresher and healthier than conventional food [54][55][56][57]. Alongside the plurality of consumer opinions about local food [58] meanings of local food also differ among entities in the food systems, and may relate to their objectives within the food system.…”
Section: Starting Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, those initiatives are promoted by sustainable food system coalitions in major Canadian cities such as Montreal [15], Edmonton [16] and Toronto [17]. Freshness, variety, quality and taste are important attributes of these alternative food supplies that may help FV consumption [18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, evidence on their effectiveness in increasing FV access remains scarce [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on farmers' market interventions designed to improve FV accessibility in Canada and elsewhere report sociodemographic determinants of use. While shoppers are primarily middle-aged women [20,21,[33][34][35][36][37], associations between educational attainment or ethnicity and shopping patterns are discordant [38]. Market location appears to be linked to customers' socioeconomic profiles [35,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of consumers at farmers' markets in Toronto, Ontario, found that consumers use farmers' markets not only to fulfil specific grocery needs but also to support local agricultural firms (Dodds et al 2013). Hence, sales in Ontario farmers' markets by primary producers were estimated to be between $385 million and $577 million annually in 2010, up from an estimated $73 million in 1999 (Cummings et al 1999;Regional Analytics and Planscape 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%