2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2018)094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent searches for SMEFT effects in non-resonant dijet events

Abstract: We investigate the bounds which can be placed on generic new-physics contributions to dijet production at the LHC using the framework of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, deriving the first consistently-treated EFT bounds from non-resonant high-energy data. We recast an analysis searching for quark compositeness, equivalent to treating the SM with one higher-dimensional operator as a complete UV model. In order to reach consistent, model-independent EFT conclusions, it is necessary to truncate the EFT… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loop corrections to very precisely measured and particularly interesting processes have been calculated [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. LHC searches have also been interpreted in the SMEFT, with techniques to address the unique theoretical errors inherent in high energy searches for EFT effects recently developed [33,34]. Ultimately, all of these contributions will need to coalesce into a fully global fit of the SMEFT Wilson coefficients and cutoff scale, as only then will it be possible to truly understand the conservative constraints which can be imposed on an arbitrary model through matching to the SMEFT and comparison of a given parameter point to the likelihood associated with all the relevant measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loop corrections to very precisely measured and particularly interesting processes have been calculated [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. LHC searches have also been interpreted in the SMEFT, with techniques to address the unique theoretical errors inherent in high energy searches for EFT effects recently developed [33,34]. Ultimately, all of these contributions will need to coalesce into a fully global fit of the SMEFT Wilson coefficients and cutoff scale, as only then will it be possible to truly understand the conservative constraints which can be imposed on an arbitrary model through matching to the SMEFT and comparison of a given parameter point to the likelihood associated with all the relevant measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, without flavour assumptions, one needs to deal with N op = 2499 independent operators corresponding to three fermion generations. Because of this challenge, the complexity and breadth of SMEFT analyses, in particular of LHC data, has been restricted to a subset of higher-dimensional operators so far, typically clustered in sectors that are assumed to be independent from each other [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consistent and conservative technique to derive bounds on the SMEFT from collider searches has been developed in [32] and further applied in [33]; it utilizes the well-understood techniques of perturbation theory in the context of the expansion in inverse powers of the new physics scale Λ. There are two important steps which, prior to the introduction of this technique, have not been consistently performed in searching for higher-dimension effects in the SMEFT or any other EFT-based framework for model-independent new physics parameterization in collider searches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article we utilize the prescription of [32], and follow up on the insight of [33] that lower-energy colliders can provide constraints complementary to those which can be extracted from the LHC. We thus explore the application of Tevatron data in the dijet channel to the SMEFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%