2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consistent and reproducible staining of glia by a modified Golgi–Cox method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine the morphology and swelling of astrocytes, a modified Golgi-Cox staining was used (Gull et al, 2015). Some brain slices were stained with FD Rapid GolgiStainTM Kit (FD Neurotechnologies, Inc., USA).…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the morphology and swelling of astrocytes, a modified Golgi-Cox staining was used (Gull et al, 2015). Some brain slices were stained with FD Rapid GolgiStainTM Kit (FD Neurotechnologies, Inc., USA).…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found that the tissue-protectant (cryoprotectant) solution (de Olmos et al, 1978 ; Watson et al, 1986 ) is very helpful to preserve tissue quality, reduce the staining background, and improve the attachment of sections to gelatin-coated slides. Minor additional steps can be added to our protocol to amend it for younger mice (Koyama and Tohyama, 2012 ) or to increase the staining for glia cells more than neurons (Ranjan and Mallick, 2012 ; Gull et al, 2015 ). Using our protocol, we found that initial brief fixation of brain samples with 4% PFA for 1 h followed by dd-H 2 O washing improves the staining for younger mice (Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, the Golgi-Cox method is considered to be most reliable in demonstrating dendritic arborization with a low background (Buell, 1982 ; Koyama, 2013 ). Many modifications of this method have been conducted and most aimed to increase its reliability (Angulo et al, 1996 ; Gibb and Kolb, 1998 ; Koyama and Tohyama, 2012 ), to reduce the required time (Ranjan and Mallick, 2010 ; Levine et al, 2013 ; Patro et al, 2013 ), and to increase the selectivity of neuronal vs. glial staining or vice versa (Ranjan and Mallick, 2012 ; Gull et al, 2015 ). Also, commercial kits have been developed for relatively fast constant Golgi staining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For astrocytic staining, the manufacturer’s protocol was modified as described by Gull et al (2015). Briefly, isoflurane anesthetized animals were transcardially perfused with 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), brains were post-fixed for 4 days in the same fixative additionally containing 8% glutaraldehyde, submerged in a 1:1 mixture of solution A and B for 3 days at 26°C, transferred into solution C for 7 days at 4°C, sectioned on a cryostat (Leica CM3050 S, Germany) into 150μm coronal slices, mounted on Superfrost slides (Thermo Scientific, USA), stained in solutions D and E for 10 minutes, covered with Entellan (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and coded before quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%