2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of multiple flower–insect interactions for subsequent plant–insect interactions and plant reproduction

Abstract: Plants often interact with a wide range of antagonists and mutualists simultaneously, and their combined effects may not be accurately predicted by studies manipulating single species (e.g., Strauss and Irwin, 2004; Morris et al., 2007; Terhorst et al., 2018). Thus, there has been recent interest in studying plant-insect interactions in a broader community context to better understand the ecological and evolutionary impacts of non-additive effects on plants (i.e., statistically significant interactions between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herbivore-induced changes can increase the attraction of pollinators [8,65,66], potentially via changes in floral volatile emission [67]. An increased attraction of pollinators can increase reproductive output [67,68], but not necessarily [65], and this likely depends on conditions such as pollen and resource limitations.…”
Section: Adaptiveness Of Floral Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Herbivore-induced changes can increase the attraction of pollinators [8,65,66], potentially via changes in floral volatile emission [67]. An increased attraction of pollinators can increase reproductive output [67,68], but not necessarily [65], and this likely depends on conditions such as pollen and resource limitations.…”
Section: Adaptiveness Of Floral Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased attraction of pollinators can increase reproductive output [67,68], but not necessarily [65], and this likely depends on conditions such as pollen and resource limitations. Herbivore-induced changes can lead to increased resistance to florivores, seed predators, and nectar thieves [66,69], by changes in flower chemistry [7,37,70,71]. Leaf-herbivore-induced resistance to seed predators benefits plants of Oenothera biennis by reducing seed predation to a large extent, whereas leaf herbivory itself had little impact on reproductive output [37].…”
Section: Adaptiveness Of Floral Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that antagonist–antagonist interactions are not limited by the dependence of antagonists on resource quantity (Rusman et al, ). Herbivory affects flower quantity and quality differently (Hoffmeister et al, ; Rusman, Poelman, et al, ), and mutualists and antagonists have contrasting effects on plant reproduction (Grass, Bohle, Tscharntke, & Westphal, ; Soper Gorden & Adler, ). Therefore, variable importance of resource quantity and quality for mutualists and antagonists is likely important for indirect plant fitness consequences of herbivory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can have consequences for plant‐mediated interactions (Chrétien et al, ; Soler et al, ; Stam, Chrétien, Dicke, & Poelman, ; Stam et al, ) and plant seed production (Stam et al, ). Ontogenetic variation in networks of indirect plant‐mediated interactions includes these complex interactive effects on plant fitness (Poelman & Kessler, ; Rusman et al, ; Soper Gorden & Adler, ; Stam et al, ). Taken together, variation in direct and indirect consequences of herbivory during plant ontogeny likely imposes selection pressures that drive the evolution of plant defence ontogenetic trajectories (Barton & Boege, ; Ochoa‐López et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%