2007
DOI: 10.1080/08929880701609162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of a Radiological Dispersal Event with Nuclear and Radioactive Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…see Magill et al 2007.) Table 3 illustrates the results of running MAXMIN for various scenarios involving from zero to four interdicted tasks, and with a decision-and-expediting budget of either $380 million or $480 million for the proliferator.…”
Section: Application and Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Magill et al 2007.) Table 3 illustrates the results of running MAXMIN for various scenarios involving from zero to four interdicted tasks, and with a decision-and-expediting budget of either $380 million or $480 million for the proliferator.…”
Section: Application and Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized, as reported by many authors (e.g. [1,2]), that although the purpose behind the use of radiological dispersion devices (RDDs) is not to destroy a city or cause a high number of fatalities, they can have the major long-term effect of increasing cancer cases mainly related to the inhalation of radioactive particles [2,3]. To calculate the impact of RDDs on the population, the quantification of the release (total mass and activity) and its description (size distribution, chemical composition and isotopic composition) is necessary (a.k.a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A radiological dispersal device (RDD) is one of many conceivable ways in which radioactive material could be maliciously dispersed and exposed to the general public [6]. An explosive RDD, colloquially referred to as a "dirty bomb", spreads radioactive material through detonation of a chemical explosive charge [8]. Various hypothetical scenarios have been conceived for such an attack [3,9], which typically assume a commercial or industrial radioactive source and up to several kilograms of conventional explosive (e.g., trinitrotoluene, TNT) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explosive RDD, colloquially referred to as a "dirty bomb", spreads radioactive material through detonation of a chemical explosive charge [8]. Various hypothetical scenarios have been conceived for such an attack [3,9], which typically assume a commercial or industrial radioactive source and up to several kilograms of conventional explosive (e.g., trinitrotoluene, TNT) [8]. Even if the direct health effects from radiation exposure will be minimal, the costs associated with the potential disruption and remediation will be considerable [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%