2018
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kax063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectionism and Behavioral Clusters: Differential Patterns in Predicting Expectations to Engage in Health Behaviors

Abstract: A connectionist approach can be useful for understanding how different patterns of constructs relate to specific outcomes. The findings provide a rationale for lay people's cognitive schema of health behaviors, with each behavioral cluster possessing characteristics associated with distinct predictors of expectations to engage in it. These unique activation patterns point to factors that may be particularly significant for health interventions targeting different clusters of health behaviors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchpoints to the tendency of health behaviours to have high temporal stability,making past behaviours among the strongest predictors of present healthbehaviour [e.g., 3,4,5,6]. This might reflect implicit or nonconscious processesthat affect behaviour, such as behavioural scripts [7] or routines [8,9].…”
Section: Predicting Current Health Behaviours From Past Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchpoints to the tendency of health behaviours to have high temporal stability,making past behaviours among the strongest predictors of present healthbehaviour [e.g., 3,4,5,6]. This might reflect implicit or nonconscious processesthat affect behaviour, such as behavioural scripts [7] or routines [8,9].…”
Section: Predicting Current Health Behaviours From Past Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the need to better understand how affective constructs may inform and supplement established theoretical models, there is also a need to understand how these constructs inform a wide spectrum of health behavior motivation and engagement (Conner et al, 2015; McEachan et al, 2016; Nudelman & Shiloh, 2018; Sandberg & Conner, 2008). Examining health behaviors in isolation is problematic because one’s overall health is an aggregate of the many health-promoting and health risk behaviors an individual performs, and therefore engagement in one type may limit potential benefits from another (Conner, McEachan, Lawton, & Gardner, 2016; Sandberg et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, emerging research suggests that the components of the TPB may be differentially important in the prediction of health-promoting versus health risk behaviors (Conner et al, 2017, 2015; McEachan, Conner, Taylor, & Lawton, 2011; McEachan et al, 2016). Knowing which components of the theoretical models are likely to have the greatest impact for particular behaviors has significant implications for the targeting and design of interventions to improve public health (McEachan et al, 2011; Nudelman & Shiloh, 2018). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is empirical evidence that outcome expectancies can explain the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors (e.g. Nudelman and Shiloh, 2018). However, in a meta-analysis by Young et al (2014) on the effects of SCT variables only a third of the 71 included outcome expectancy constructs showed direct effects on physical activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%