1978
DOI: 10.1002/bip.1978.360171203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformation of poly(L‐arginine). I. Effects of anions

Abstract: SynopsisThe conformational transition of poly(L-arginine) by binding with various mono-, di-, and polyvalent anions, especially with SO:-, was studied by CD measurements. The intramolecular random coil-to-a-helix conformational transition and the subsequent transition to the 0-turn-like structure was caused by binding with SO:-. The binding data obtained from equilibrium dialysis experiments showed that the a-helical conformation of poly(i-arginine)is stabilized a t a 1:3 stoichiometric ratio of bound SO: -to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is suggested by these results that the a-helical conformation of poly(L-arginine) is formed as a resuk of the contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, similar to the cases of poly(L-lysine) and poly(Lornithine). It should be noted here that the interaction between the cationic group of the side chain ofpoly(Larginine) and the anionic group of AOT may be effectively produced not only by the usual electrostatic interaction, but also by the hydrogen bond as shown in the following way, according to the suggestion of Zamma et al [9], in the case of the interaction between the guanidinium group and the sulfate anion. The guanidinium group is considered to be the water structure breaking property [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is suggested by these results that the a-helical conformation of poly(L-arginine) is formed as a resuk of the contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, similar to the cases of poly(L-lysine) and poly(Lornithine). It should be noted here that the interaction between the cationic group of the side chain ofpoly(Larginine) and the anionic group of AOT may be effectively produced not only by the usual electrostatic interaction, but also by the hydrogen bond as shown in the following way, according to the suggestion of Zamma et al [9], in the case of the interaction between the guanidinium group and the sulfate anion. The guanidinium group is considered to be the water structure breaking property [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the case of poly(L-arginine), an a-helical conformation is induced by the addition of SDS to aqueous solutions [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result indicates that other factors in addition to electrostatic forces, such as hydrophobic bonding and chain stiffness, modulate polycation-membrane interactions. POIY-Llysine has lower hydrophobic bonding (Ichimura & Zama, 1977) and non-specific electrostatic binding ability (Ichimura et al, 1978) than poly-L-arginine. There are also differences in the ability of these polycations to display helical conformation which increases chain stiffness, thus decreasing chain interaction with charged surfaces (Ichimura et al, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This phenomenon probably reflects the ability of SO~-ions (in common with Pi and PPi ions) to bind to a-helix structures in proteins [11]. Thus interconversion between E s and Er may involve changes in a-helix content and E r formation is possibly facilitated in the presence of these oxyanions.…”
Section: Activation and Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%