1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00018374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purified Ribulose-P2 carboxylase from wheat with high specific activity and with fast activation

Abstract: Isolation of Ribulose-P2 carboxylase/oxygenase and its purification to homogeneity often results in losses of enzyme activity. Attempts were made to decrease these losses by adding fructose-P2, SO ]-, Pi or PPi to the buffers used during early stages of the extraction and purification of the enzyme. Yield and final specific activity were not improved, but fructose-P2 and PPi became bound to the enzyme and modified its activation characteristics. The enzyme prepared with fructose-P2 showed a much decreased rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1985
1985
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…RuBPc-o activity was proportional to the amount of protein, so that the mean specific activity was 3-74 /imol g RuBPc-o protein" l s" 1 (Table 1) corresponding to approximately 6-4 fimo\ g RuBPc-o protein" 1 s" 1 at 25 °C. This was lower than the 30 fxmo\ g RuBPc-o protein" 1 s" 1 determined by Schmidt, Cornelius, Burton, Parry, Millard, Keys, and Gutteridge (1984) for purified protein under optimal conditions. Makino et al (1984) measured specific activity of 80 fimo\ g RuBPc-o protein" 1 s" 1 in rice.…”
Section: Enzyme Activitycontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…RuBPc-o activity was proportional to the amount of protein, so that the mean specific activity was 3-74 /imol g RuBPc-o protein" l s" 1 (Table 1) corresponding to approximately 6-4 fimo\ g RuBPc-o protein" 1 s" 1 at 25 °C. This was lower than the 30 fxmo\ g RuBPc-o protein" 1 s" 1 determined by Schmidt, Cornelius, Burton, Parry, Millard, Keys, and Gutteridge (1984) for purified protein under optimal conditions. Makino et al (1984) measured specific activity of 80 fimo\ g RuBPc-o protein" 1 s" 1 in rice.…”
Section: Enzyme Activitycontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…RuBPc-o may have low catalytic activity in vitro due to inadequate CO2 or magnesium for activation, or to incorrect pH (Boyle, 1983) or to decreased availability of inorganic phosphate and increased concentrations of non-reducing sugars, sugar phosphates etc. (Friedrich and Huffaker, 1980;Ku, Prickril, Reger, and Pallas, 1982;Schmidt, Cornelius, Burton, Parry, Millard, Keys, and Gutteridge, 1984) but the importance of these factors in vivo has not been assessed. Products of the PCR cycle might be expected to accumulate in chloroplasts with high rates of />", inhibiting assimilation.…”
Section: Assimilation Rate Carboxylation Efficiency and Rubpc-o Charmentioning
confidence: 99%