Conference interpreting in Japan

Takeda, Kayoko; Matsushita, and Kayo

doi:10.4324/9780429297878-16

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, by early summer 2020, remote interpreting started to emerge as an alternative to on-site interpreting in Japan. Before the pandemic, overthe-phone interpreting (OPI) and video remote interpreting (VRI) had been used in business and community settings, but RSI was used only in a limited capacity (Takeda & Matsushita, 2021). This situation began to change rapidly as the demand from the global business community forced meetings to take place online, which meant that interpreters had to transition in tandem in order to stay relevant.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Remote Interpreting Changed the Japanese Interpreting Industry

Matsushita¹

2022

incontext

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is widely known in the interpreting industry that the COVID-19 pandemic served as a catalyst for the global spread of remote interpreting, the technology for which had existed for years prior. As governments and businesses continued to hold their meetings online or in hybrid forms even after lockdowns were lifted, demand kept rising (Nimdzi Insights, 2022). In order to investigate the immediate impact of the pandemic on remote interpreting, an online survey with a focus on remote simultaneous interpreting (RSI) was conducted in the summer of 2020 in Japan (Matsushita, 2020b). The results revealed that while only 18.8% (n = 43) of the 229 respondents had RSI experience before the pandemic, the number jumped to 44.5% (n = 102) by the end of July 2020, with 91.7% (n = 210) of them envisioning that remote interpreting opportunities will continue to increase. This prediction turned out to be true: a smaller survey conducted in Japan 17 months later in January 2022 revealed that all 51 respondents (100%) had experienced remote interpreting, with 58.8% (n = 30) saying that almost all of their assignments (at the time of the survey) were taking place remotely (Ikaros Publications, 2022). This trend is, of course, not limited to Japan. Numerous industry reports published in 2021 and 2022 showed a shared conviction that remote interpreting is here to stay (e.g., Association of Language Companies, 2021; Nimdzi Insights, 2022; Slator, 2022). Against this backdrop, this study conducted a detailed analysis of the survey responses from Matsushita (2020b) to reinvestigate the transformation the interpreters experienced during the most turbulent months of the pandemic and find insights into remote interpreting in the post-pandemic world. Compared to Matsushita (2020b), which reported the aggregated survey results, this study will focus more on differences among the interpreters, language pairs, and interpreting genres represented.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Remote Interpreting Changed the Japanese Interpreting Industry

Matsushita¹

2022

incontext

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Conference interpreting in Japan

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

How Remote Interpreting Changed the Japanese Interpreting Industry

How Remote Interpreting Changed the Japanese Interpreting Industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About