1986
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198606000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone Adaptation in Age-Related Maculopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only is the amplitude of the photopic a-wave reduced but the implicit time is also prolonged, indicating that remaining cones, or at least their synaptic transmission, is slower than in elderly normals. These findings support the data of Brown and coworkers, who described elevated cone adaptation thresholds and also concluded a more peripheral involvement in the disease [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not only is the amplitude of the photopic a-wave reduced but the implicit time is also prolonged, indicating that remaining cones, or at least their synaptic transmission, is slower than in elderly normals. These findings support the data of Brown and coworkers, who described elevated cone adaptation thresholds and also concluded a more peripheral involvement in the disease [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, either in the EOG and in the ERG we found significant differences between ARMD patients and age-matched normal controls. With psychophysical tests in ARMD changes of the retinal sensitivity and affected cone adaptation have been described, which supports these findings [5,6,31]. Vascular changes seen in ARMD may be one of the mechanisms responsible for a more global retinal dysfunction [10,13,23,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] There have been several studies showing impairment of the photopic and scotopic pathways in early ARM subjects. 8,10,[12][13][14][15][16] Phipps et al 12 demonstrated an alteration of cone adaptational kinetics by measuring the post-bleaching recovery time to various contrast multiples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colour discrimination Bowman 1980, 45 Bowman and Cameron 1984, 46 Collins 1986, 47 Applegate et al 1987, 48 Collins and Brown 1989a, 49 Sunness et al 1989, 50 Haegerstrom-Portnoy and Brown 1989, 51 Eisner et al 1992, 52 Cheng and Vingrys 1993, 40 Feigl et al 2004 53 Colour matching Smith et al 1988, 54 Eisner et al 1987a and b, 1991, 1992 34,52,55,56 Contrast sensitivity: Sjostrand 1979, 57 Brown and Lovie-Kitchin 1987, 36 Kleiner et al spatial/temporal/colour 1988, 58 Collins and Brown 1989a, 49 Owsley et al 1990, 59 Frennerson et al 1995, 60 Midena et al 1997, 61 Phipps 38 Swann and Lovie-Kitchin 1991, 39 Cheng and Vingys 1993, 40 Tolentino et al 1994, 41 Midena et al 1994, 1997, 61,65 Sheu et al 2002, 66 Phipps et al 2004, 67 Goldstein et al 2005 68 Cone adaptation Brown et al 1986, 69 Collins and Brown 1989a and b, 49,70 dynamics/glare recovery Brown and Lovie-Kitchin 1989a, 71 Eisner et al 1987a and b, 1991, 1992 34,52,55,56 Cheng and Vingys 1993, 40 Sandberg and Gaudio 1995, 72 Sandberg et al 1998, 73 Midena et al 1997, …”
Section: Visual Function Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%