Conditions for successful local resource management: lessons from a Brazilian small-scale trawling fishery

Abstract

Conditions for successful common-pool resources management institutions have been systematized by Elinor Ostrom as a set of ''design principles for robust governance''. The comparison of two attempts to developing a local informal managing institution for shrimp trawling, 30 years apart (the late 1970s and 2010 attempts), and in the same community (therefore, the same socioecological system-SES) in Southern Brazil, provides a convenient ground to test the hypothesis that the degree of success of each attempt is related to the degree of adherence to Ostrom's principles. Moreover, the comparison allows investigating how conditions and changes in the SES affect management institutions. Our institutional analysis showed that the 1970s attempt followed a local rule that best fitted almost all principles, which may explain its relative success and longer-lasting activity. However, changes such as the emergence of new technologies and increased fishing activity gradually led to an erosion of the local rule. A low level of group cohesion, regional socioeconomic changes, increased fishing effort, and lack of legal provisions for fishers to develop local managing institutions were the main factors that led to institutional failure in the two evaluated attempts. Additionally, the lack of ability to adapt to changing conditions weakened the continuity of the management regime. Although Brazil has created new fishery co-management policies, strategies to enable institutions at local levels are urgently needed for improved performance.

Healing Brazil's Blue Amazon: The Role of Knowledge Networks in Nurturing Cross-Scale Transformations at the Frontlines of Ocean Sustainability

“…Sustaining long-term collaboration in coastal and ocean governance thus is a wicked problem in Brazil, where institutional and resource provision is highly unstable; and where the political culture of social participation in MPAs still rarely fuels vibrant public environmental stewardship over the longer term (Marroni and Asmus, 2013;Trimble et al, 2014;De Freitas et al, 2015;Gerhardinger et al, 2015b;Serafini et al, 2017), with few exceptions (Glaser et al, 2005). Nevertheless, higher levels of active participation remain paramount for engaging local ecological knowledge in Brazilian MPA planning.…”

A decade and a half of learning from Madagascar's first locally managed marine area

“…To improve the effectiveness of LMMAs, we require an improved understanding of the conditions affecting their success. A growing body of research shows that effectiveness depends on project design principles (Blythe et al, 2017; Cinner et al, 2012; Gutierrez, Hilborn, & Defeo, 2011; Oviedo & Bursztyn, 2016; Serafini, Medeiros, & Andriguetto‐Filho, 2017), contextual conditions such as social capital (Diedrich, Stoeckl, Gurney, Esparon, & Pollnac, 2016; Gutierrez et al, 2011; Kawaka et al, 2017; Kosamu, 2015; Sutton & Rudd, 2015), and the types, levels, and duration of inputs and support from outside stakeholders (Aswani et al, 2017; Freed, Dujon, Granek, & Mouhhidine, 2016; Mahajan & Daw, 2016; Weeks & Jupiter, 2013). Indeed over 50 variables have been identified which may influence the sustainability of such social‐ecological systems (Blythe et al, 2017; Ostrom, 2007, 2009).…”

Ostrom’s Governance Principles and Sustainable Financing of Fish Reserves

“…Ostrom's design principles are also applied to fisheries comanagement (e.g., Serafini et al 2017). The concept of fisheries co-management is increasingly recognised among governments, development agencies and academics as a promising way to provide for more equitable, efficient and sustainable systems of fisheries management than centralised government intervention (Nielsen et al 2004).…”