2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Delays and Apportionment of Damages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality Failure Definition [53,54] Liquidated damages: owner recovers delay costs caused by the contractor. The recovery can also be apportioned among the parties when the delay is concurrently caused.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality Failure Definition [53,54] Liquidated damages: owner recovers delay costs caused by the contractor. The recovery can also be apportioned among the parties when the delay is concurrently caused.…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, because the contractor typically uses contractual terms, such as liquidation damages clauses or payment retentions and guarantees to weaken the subcontractor's threat (Chang and Ive, 2007b;Greenwood, Hog, and Kan, 2005), the threat of delay gains credibility whenever these contractual terms are undermined. A major factor causing the undermining of these clauses is the presence of 'change orders' in specialty trade activities, as these change orders cause a delay of the subcontractor activities that typically cannot be unambiguously claimed to be the subcontractor's responsibility Ive, 2007a, 2007b;Greenwood et al, 2005;Ibbs, Nguyen, and Simonian, 2011;Uher, 1991). This factor opens a window of opportunity for subcontractors to extract economic quasi-rents (Chang and Ive, 2007b), for example by overbidding on the price of the new works.…”
Section: Transactional Hazards In Subcontracting For Specialty Tradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because each country has its own set of rules and regulations, legal constraints, and operational environment, Critical Success Factors differ when we travel from one country to another and from one project to the next. Several dimensions of critical success factor have been specified in detail by several authors (Ashley et al, 1987 ; Pinto and Slevin, 1987 ; Belassi and Tukel, 1996 ; Eriksson, 2008 ; Yang et al, 2009 ; Ibbs et al, 2010 ; Ahmadabadi and Heravi, 2019 ). According to Saqib et al ( 2008 ), seven critical success factor influence project success.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%