2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12207-021-09408-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance Between Standard and Abbreviated Administrations of the Test of Memory Malingering: Implications for Streamlining Performance Validity Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, data from this study provided preliminary support for their potential aggregated use in that a clinician may be more confident that a T1 failure signals invalidity rather than a false positive error if T1e10 was also failed. Our findings from the current study are largely consistent with prior literature demonstrating good concordance between T1 and T1e10 in clinical settings (Ovsiew et al, 2021) and lend further support to the assertion that T1e10 is a robust predictor of T1 performance (Denning, 2021). In particular, this study demonstrated, across both samples, that ≥4 T1e10 errors was associated with a 0% chance of ultimately passing T1, suggesting that examiners may be able to discontinue administration of the entire T1 or the rest of the TOMM after observing four or more errors on the first 10 items of T1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…That said, data from this study provided preliminary support for their potential aggregated use in that a clinician may be more confident that a T1 failure signals invalidity rather than a false positive error if T1e10 was also failed. Our findings from the current study are largely consistent with prior literature demonstrating good concordance between T1 and T1e10 in clinical settings (Ovsiew et al, 2021) and lend further support to the assertion that T1e10 is a robust predictor of T1 performance (Denning, 2021). In particular, this study demonstrated, across both samples, that ≥4 T1e10 errors was associated with a 0% chance of ultimately passing T1, suggesting that examiners may be able to discontinue administration of the entire T1 or the rest of the TOMM after observing four or more errors on the first 10 items of T1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Specifically, T1, when used alone, has demonstrated utility among community volunteers, veterans, civilians, older adults, and criminal forensic referrals. T1 has also shown comparable classification accuracy and psychometric properties to that of T2, when used following T1, even though T1 alone has a briefer administration time and reduces patient burden (Martin et al, 2020; Ovsiew et al, 2021). Additionally, T1e10 (i.e., the first 10 items of T1) has received increasing attention in the PVT literature, given its potential as another, even further abbreviated index from the TOMM (Denning, 2021; Grabyan et al, 2018; Kulas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations