2006
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200510616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concerning the instantaneous mass and the extent of an expanding universe

Abstract: Key words cosmology: mass of the universe -cosmology: cosmic densityIn this article we want to answer the cosmologically relevant question what, with some good semantic and physical reason, could be called the mass Mu of an infinitely extended, homogeneously matter-filled and expanding universe. To answer this question we produce a space-like sum of instantaneous cosmic energy depositions surrounding equally each spacepoint in the homogeneous universe. We calculate the added-up instantaneous cosmic energy per … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter fact by the way has been emphasized as true for completely different reasonings, eg. by Einstein (1920), Dirac (1937), Whitrow (1946), Hoyle (1990Hoyle ( , 1992, Fahr (2006), Fahr & Heyl (2006) and Fahr & Zoennchen (2006). The above derived result finally challenges to put the question of how large the mass of the universe under these auspices might have been at the very early cosmic time, when the radius of the universe amounted to one Planck scale R Pl = hG/c 3 of a Planck mass m Pl = hc/G.…”
Section: Density and Mass Of The Universementioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter fact by the way has been emphasized as true for completely different reasonings, eg. by Einstein (1920), Dirac (1937), Whitrow (1946), Hoyle (1990Hoyle ( , 1992, Fahr (2006), Fahr & Heyl (2006) and Fahr & Zoennchen (2006). The above derived result finally challenges to put the question of how large the mass of the universe under these auspices might have been at the very early cosmic time, when the radius of the universe amounted to one Planck scale R Pl = hG/c 3 of a Planck mass m Pl = hc/G.…”
Section: Density and Mass Of The Universementioning
confidence: 69%
“…In this respect R u can be called the distance between two arbitrary space points comoving with the Robertson-Walker-like homologous cosmological expansion of the universe, validating the relationṘ u /R u =Ṡ/S, if S for instance is the distance between any two freely comoving galaxies (dots on top of quantities mean derivatives with respect to cosmic time). This relation was already suggested by considerations carried out by Kolb (1989), Overduin & Fahr (2001 or Fahr & Heyl (2006). A detailed justification for such a scaling behaviour will be provided in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As evident from the above expression no real matter can be summed-up anymore from beyond the "local Schwarzschild infinity" (i.e. "point-associated Schwarzschild mass horizon", see Fahr & Heyl (2006)) which is at a distance…”
Section: How To Define the Mass Of The Universe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is a general expression of Mach's principle (Assis, 1994;Brans & Dicke, 1961) showing that our model can fulfil the principle of equivalence of rotation (Fahr & Heyl, 2006). It is often useful to introduce the critical density ρ c : and the density parameter Ω (we take the effects of a cosmological constant into account by including the vacuum energy density ρ Λ = Λ/8πG into the total density).…”
Section: The Solutions Of the Friedmann Equationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…That result could appear surprising, but, as explained in , it has yet been emphasized as possibly true from completely different reasonings by many physicists (Dirac, 1937;Einstein, 1917;Fahr & Heyl, 2006;Fahr & Zoennchen, 2006;Hoyle, 1990;1992;Whitrow, 1946). It moreover appears, on one hand, that a scaling of masses with the cosmic scale factor is the most natural scale required to make the theory of general relativity conformally scale-invariant (H. Weyl's…”
Section: The Solutions Of the Friedmann Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%