The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Aspects of Today's Cosmology 2011
DOI: 10.5772/24505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revised Concepts for Cosmic Vacuum Energy and Binding Energy: Innovative Cosmology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words: At decreasing cosmic binding energy the effective density increases by the rateρ * which is identical to that one obtained by Hoyle (1948) (also see Fahr and Sokaliwska 2011).…”
Section: Does Structure Formation Accelerate Cosmic Expansion and Actsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In other words: At decreasing cosmic binding energy the effective density increases by the rateρ * which is identical to that one obtained by Hoyle (1948) (also see Fahr and Sokaliwska 2011).…”
Section: Does Structure Formation Accelerate Cosmic Expansion and Actsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Thus an action without any backreaction contains a conceptual error, that is, a misconception. That means, if empty space causes something to change in terms of spacegeometry, because it represents some energy that serves as a source of spacetime geometry, perhaps since space itself is energy-loaded, then with some evidence this vacuum-influenced spacegeometry should change the energy-loading of space (see [54][55][56]). There is, however, a direct hint that modern precision cosmology [1] does not respect this principle.…”
Section: A Physically Logic Conception Of Empty Spacetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It, for instance, implies that a completely empty space does not accelerate its expansion but can stagnate and leave cosmic test photons without permanently increasing redshifts and that on the other hand a matter-filled universe with a vacuum energy density different from vac,0 leads to an effective value of Λ eff which now in general does not need to be constant. It nevertheless remains a hard problem to determine this function Λ eff for a matter-filled universe in which a matter-polarized vacuum (see [56]) different from the vacuum of the empty space prevails. In the following we briefly discuss general options one has to describe this vacuum.…”
Section: A Physically Logic Conception Of Empty Spacetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9), but this time we especially look for the transport equation of the density moment n = n(t) by multiplying the kinetic equation with 4πv 2 dv and integrating it over the whole velocity space, however, now including a term for particle creation from viscous energy generation. This then yields the following moment equation (18) where the term is thought to represent a possible particle production per unit volume and time due to matter creation from the energy going into pair-production collision processes. This latter term thus might be extracted from the energy dissipation term assuming that, as a maximum, the following particle creation rate could be expected to result from it (19) and thus leads to the following revised density moment equation (20) which expresses the fact that the particle production term will only become non-negligible, if thermal energies are growing up to the order of the rest mass energy of the particles, i.e.…”
Section: Particle Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative ideas on cosmic matter creation have already in the past been discussed at several places in the literature as e.g. by Mach [9], Dehnen and Honl [10], Hoyle [11,12], Hoyle, Burbidge and Narlikar [13], Fahr [14], Fahr and Zoennchen [15], Fahr and Heyl [16,17], Fahr and Sokaliwska [18,19]. In the following part of the paper we shall, however, now study in more detail how much matter creation can especially be expected to originate from the process of viscous energy dissipation in thermal matter of a cosmic Hubble flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%