Conceptualising the moderating role of knowledge management within supply chain risks and supply chain risk management

Waqas, Umair; Rahman, Azmawani Binti Abd.; Ismail, Normaz Wana; Basha, Norazlyn Kamal; Umair, Sonia

doi:10.24259/fs.v3i2.6426

Cited by 6 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 104 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The failure to understand market needs is caused by unstable customer demands and inadequate information from customers about their needs, including the type and the number of products (Shahbaz et al ., 2019b). Moreover, Waqas et al. (2019) highlight that if a firm cannot meet market needs then the company will fail to survive in the market.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk propagation and resilience in the agribusiness supply chain: a systematic literature review

Imbiri

Rameezdeen

Chileshe

et al. 2023

JADEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate risk propagation and resilience in the agribusiness supply chain (ASC).Design/methodology/approachThe paper undertakes a systematic literature review (SLR). Overall, 94 articles from six databases published between 2000 and 2022 underwent descriptive and thematic analysis.FindingsThere is a lack of research on risk propagation and resilience in the ASC for more than two decades. Accordingly, this research fills the gap in the extant literature by advancing the construct of risk propagation and resilience in the ASC and developing a framework proposing directions in risk propagation and resilience in ASC research.Research limitations/implicationsFirstly, only the Web of Science and Scopus databases were mostly used as primary sources while other databases were used as secondary sources to validate search results. Secondly, SLR is based on the peer-reviewed articles, books and conference papers; other non-academic sources relevant to the topic were not included in this paper.Originality/valueThe paper offers a set of constructs for understanding risk propagation and resilience in the ASC, develops a framework proposing directions in risk propagation and resilience in the ASC research and recommends three key themes for future research directions, namely, keep updated with recent constructs of risk propagation and resilience in the ASC, conduct case studies based on empirical studies to determine the current risk dependency and propagation in the ASC and conduct case studies based on empirical studies to determine resilience and sustainability in the ASC.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk propagation and resilience in the agribusiness supply chain: a systematic literature review

Imbiri

Rameezdeen

Chileshe

et al. 2023

JADEE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Financial risks are significant in agro‐food value chains (Shahbaz et al, 2019; Waqas et al, 2019). Systemic risks adversely affect the profitability of agro‐food firms (Kamble et al, 2020).…”

Section: Background and Research Gapsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How can banks and finance companies incorporate value chain factors in their risk management strategy? The case of agro‐food firms

Wasan

Kumar

Luthra³

2022

Bus Strat Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A value chain framework for guiding the financial firms in their credit decisions is urgent, as the current COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted, but missing in the extant literature, particularly for those that lend to industries sensitive to value and supply chain bottlenecks. This study creates knowledge in value chain finance, a big untapped and un-researched market. It constructs, confirms, and validates a value chain framework for assessing risks in lending to Agro and Food Processing firms in which value chain risks are major business concerns globally. To pursue the objectives of the study, we use a novel methodology that integrates the Modified Delphi technique, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and discriminant analysis. Based on testing and analysis of primary data, including loan data, a framework comprising six factors is proposed for use in conjunction with existing risk assessment models of finance companies to improve the quality of their credit decisions, contributing to their performance sustainability.agro-food, bankruptcy, default risk, risk management, supply chain financing, value chain | INTRODUCTIONIncreasing modernization is causing higher integration and interdependence among firms across the value chain. Technology has connected value chains globally, providing new opportunities for small companies and market players from developing countries and emerging-market economies to partake in the world economy as they are now not required to hold expertise in all the stages of production and distribution (OECD, 2021). Technology-enabled changes over the last many years have also magnified the swiftness and size of disruptions in an unprecedented manner, which conjoined with increasing trends of globalization, urbanization, environmental performance concerns, and shifting demographics are amplifying and intensifying uncertainty in the marketplace (Lee & Trimi, 2021). The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the year 2020 is estimated to have caused combined revenue losses of up to $4 trillion in U.S. and European firms from supply chain disruptions (Mitchell, 2021). It has highlighted and advanced the need for firms to bring changes in their traditional business models for sustaining performance in periods of crisis (Breier et al., 2021;Khan et al., 2021). Sixty-four percent of U.S. and European firms had revenue losses between 6% and 20% in 2020, along with severe damage to their brand value (Mitchell, 2021). Although the COVID-19 in present times is a significant disruptor responsible for straining and breaking the value chains, it is only one among other disruptive forces such as cyberattacks, diverging regulations, and instability in commodity prices (Clark, 2021). Companies across industries can expect significant financial loss causing value chain disruptions every 3.7 years

show abstract

“…For instance, SCR has been divided into two categories: macro and micro risks [19], or catastrophic and operational [52]. Further, SCR has been divided into five sources: supply, process, demand, environmental and financial [57].…”

Section: Supply Chain Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Risk mitigation, for example, is related to the risk of disruption to production uncertainties (e.g., machine failure) [56], violations of the company's code of ethics, and administrative errors and lawsuits [109,111]. However, in this paper internal risks that encompass organisational risk factors are divided into five sources of risk: supply, demand, process and control, logistical/infrastructural, and financial-side risks [16,34,39,[47][48][49]57,59,75].…”

Section: Internal Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Taxonomy for Risks in Agribusiness Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agribusiness supply chain (ASC) risk is currently a major business problem throughout the world. The current trend of globalisation has affected every business, and supply chain risks have become a concern in logistics and other business processes. Current risk management strategies must address a variety of global and local challenges. To tackle this issue, existing research has analysed risks in agrifood supply chains, ASC risk management, disruption in ASCs, risk assessments of agriculture supply chains and sources of risk facing an agricultural supply chain. However, the existing research has not defined and categorised risks as a basis for managing risks in ASCs. Therefore, the definition and categorisation of risks in the ASC has been overlooked. To address this gap, this paper undertakes a systematic literature review, offering constructs to define and categorise risks in ASCs, and develops a novel taxonomy in ASC risks to enrich future research on ASC risk management. Sixty-one articles from six databases published between 2000 and 2020 underwent descriptive and thematic analysis.

show abstract

Conceptualising the moderating role of knowledge management within supply chain risks and supply chain risk management

Cited by 6 publications

References 104 publications

Risk propagation and resilience in the agribusiness supply chain: a systematic literature review

Risk propagation and resilience in the agribusiness supply chain: a systematic literature review

How can banks and finance companies incorporate value chain factors in their risk management strategy? The case of agro‐food firms

A Novel Taxonomy for Risks in Agribusiness Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About