2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13169217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Taxonomy for Risks in Agribusiness Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: Agribusiness supply chain (ASC) risk is currently a major business problem throughout the world. The current trend of globalisation has affected every business, and supply chain risks have become a concern in logistics and other business processes. Current risk management strategies must address a variety of global and local challenges. To tackle this issue, existing research has analysed risks in agrifood supply chains, ASC risk management, disruption in ASCs, risk assessments of agriculture supply chains and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The BMC is an increasingly used tool, in different fields, from identifying critical factors for rural development, to developing rural tourism, social agriculture or strategies for cooperatives [62,63]. It is generally used to describe business models in different industries [14,64].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BMC is an increasingly used tool, in different fields, from identifying critical factors for rural development, to developing rural tourism, social agriculture or strategies for cooperatives [62,63]. It is generally used to describe business models in different industries [14,64].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter characteristic is distinctively different from operational type risk which is usually having an impact to cost, quality and delivery (Shafiq et al, 2017). In assisting to a better understanding of supply chain risk typologies, several taxonomies of supply chain risks have been earlier reported by Rangel et al (2015), Hudnurkar et al (2017), Shahbaz et al (2019) and Imbiri et al (2021). Meanwhile, considering the categorization of sustainability supply chain risks, a classification model of sustainability risk taxonomy can be referred to in the work of Choirun et al (2020).…”
Section: Supply Chain Sustainability Risksliterature Review 21 Supply...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risks in agro and food processing value chains are currently major business concerns globally. Although the risk management strategies of finance companies must consider risk factors emanating from the local and global linkages in an agro‐food value chain, empirical studies to offer clear definitions and categories of value chain risks for determining the probability of corporate bankruptcy in the agro‐food industry are extremely limited in the literature (Imbiri et al, 2021). Although a risk assessment framework that comprises financial and non‐financial factors improves the accuracy of bankruptcy predictions, extant studies on bankruptcy risk factors mostly concentrate on firm‐level financial and accounting measures (Gallagher, 2001).…”
Section: Background and Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since value chain disruptions aggravate financial losses resulting in the bankruptcy of firms (Eremenko et al, 2020), value chain risks of corporate debtors are increasingly challenging the profitability of financial companies that undertake corporate lending. Incorporating network attributes in risk assessment by firms is all the more crucial for their sustained performance today, as the business environment is in the throes of transformation and will be experiencing disruptions more frequently in the future (Imbiri et al, 2021; OECD, 2020). Past research indicates that including the network attributes of the borrowing firms in the default prediction model significantly increases the precision and accuracy of the model's default estimate (Ascui & Cojoianu, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation